From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chetkovich v. United States

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Mar 9, 1931
47 F.2d 894 (9th Cir. 1931)

Opinion

March 9, 1931.

Proceedings between Mike Chetkovich and the United States. Judgment for the latter, and the former applies for leave to prosecute an appeal in forma pauperis.

Application denied.

John A. Shelton, of Butte, Mont., for appellant.

Wellington D. Rankin, U.S. Atty., of Helena, Mont.

Before RUDKIN, WILBUR, and SAWTELLE, Circuit Judges.


The affidavit in support of the application for leave to prosecute the appeal in this case in forma pauperis avers: "There is no person interested by contract or otherwise in the said cause of action or entitled to share in the recovery thereunder who is able to pay or secure said fees or costs." Such an affidavit is insufficient. In cases of this kind the affidavit must be made by every person interested in the recovery, including the attorney, if he has a direct interest in the result of the action. United States v. Ross (C.C.A.) 298 F. 64, and cases there cited.

The application is therefore denied, with leave to renew it on a proper showing, either in the court below or in this court; and the time for filing the transcript in this court will be extended for that purpose, if need be.


Summaries of

Chetkovich v. United States

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Mar 9, 1931
47 F.2d 894 (9th Cir. 1931)
Case details for

Chetkovich v. United States

Case Details

Full title:CHETKOVICH v. UNITED STATES

Court:Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Mar 9, 1931

Citations

47 F.2d 894 (9th Cir. 1931)

Citing Cases

Tunheim v. Bowman

(Emphasis added.)Clark makes reference to a decision of the Ninth Circuit reaching a conclusion contrary to…

Roche v. New Hampshire Nat. Bank

The statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1915, directs that those who invoke the beneficial use of this grant shall furnish a…