From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chesterfield Associates v. Edison TP

Tax Court of New Jersey
Mar 24, 1994
14 N.J. Tax 181 (Tax 1994)

Opinion

Argued February 15, 1994.

Decided March 24, 1994.

Before Judges PRESSLER and BROCHIN.

On appeal from the New Jersey Tax Court, whose decision is reported at 13 N.J. Tax 195 (Tax 1993)

Harold A. Kuskin argued the cause for appellant ( Lasser, Hochman, Marcus, Guryan Kuskin, attorneys; Mr. Kuskin, of counsel; Bruce H. Snyder, on the brief).

Margery S. Golin argued the cause for respondent.


Plaintiff Chesterfield Associates is the owner of ninety-five townhouses in Edison Township. It has appealed from the judgment of the Tax Court which fixed the assessment for these properties for the tax years 1990, 1991 and 1992.

Having carefully considered the record in this matter and the briefs and arguments of counsel, we affirm the judgment of the Tax Court substantially for the reasons stated in the opinion of Honorable Michael A. Andrew, Jr., J.T.C. dated April 26, 1993.


Summaries of

Chesterfield Associates v. Edison TP

Tax Court of New Jersey
Mar 24, 1994
14 N.J. Tax 181 (Tax 1994)
Case details for

Chesterfield Associates v. Edison TP

Case Details

Full title:CHESTERFIELD ASSOCIATES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. EDISON TOWNSHIP…

Court:Tax Court of New Jersey

Date published: Mar 24, 1994

Citations

14 N.J. Tax 181 (Tax 1994)

Citing Cases

Tamburelli Properties v. Cresskill

Cresskill posits that this constitutional provision requires each lot of the highest and best subdivision to…

County of Monmouth v. Hilton

See, e.g., Entenmann's Inc. v. Totowa Borough. 18 N.J. Tax 540, 546 (Tax 2000); Schimpf v. Little Egg Harbor…