From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chase Co. v. Bean

Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough
Aug 1, 1877
58 N.H. 183 (N.H. 1877)

Opinion

Decided August, 1877

An action at law cannot be maintained by copartners to recover a debt which has been discharged by one of them and paid by a set-off of his separate debt with his assent, when the defendant acted in good faith.

ASSUMPSIT, by C. H. Chase and S. H. Chase, partners, for goods sold. After the sale of the plaintiffs' goods to the defendant, C. H. Chase and the defendant agreed that $150 of the price should be paid by the defendant's allowing that sum in payment of a debt of that amount due to him from C. H. Chase: and that agreement was executed, the defendant acting in good faith.

Osgood and L. W. Clark, for the plaintiffs.

Smith and Andrews, for the defendant.


An action at law cannot be maintained by copartners to recover a debt which has been discharged by one of them, and paid by a set-off of his separate debt with his assent, when the defendant acted in good faith. Homer v. Wood, 11 Cush. 62; Williams v. Brimhall, 13 Gray 462; Tay v. Ladd, 15 Gray 296; Greeley v. Wyeth, 10 N.H. 15.

Case discharged.

BINGHAM, J., did not sit.


Summaries of

Chase Co. v. Bean

Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough
Aug 1, 1877
58 N.H. 183 (N.H. 1877)
Case details for

Chase Co. v. Bean

Case Details

Full title:CHASE CO. v. BEAN

Court:Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough

Date published: Aug 1, 1877

Citations

58 N.H. 183 (N.H. 1877)

Citing Cases

Morrill v. Merrill

The defendant admits that the firm had no lien because the agreement provided means of payment inconsistent…

Gale v. Barnes

Puffer v. Graves, 26 N.H. 256; Jones v. Roberts, 60 N.H. 216. Payment of a judgment obtained against them…