From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chappelle v. Sharp

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
Nov 22, 1961
301 F.2d 506 (D.C. Cir. 1961)

Opinion

No. 16310.

Argued October 20, 1961.

Decided November 22, 1961. Petition for Rehearing Denied January 15, 1962. Certiorari Denied May 28, 1962. See 82 S.Ct. 1250.

Mr. Sommers T. Brown, Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. Paul M. Rhodes, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for appellant.

Mr. Nathan J. Paulson, Asst. U.S. Atty., for appellees. Mr. David C. Acheson, U.S. Atty., Mr. Charles T. Duncan, Principal Asst. U.S. Atty., and Miss Doris H. Spangenburg, Asst. U.S. Atty., were on the brief, for appellees.

Before PRETTYMAN, WASHINGTON and BURGER, Circuit Judges.


This is a civil action in which the plaintiff sought reinstatement in a Civil Service position in Federal Government employ, expungement from the employment records of all references to his removal, and back pay for the period of his unemployment. His appeal to the Civil Service Commission was adversely decided on August 1, 1957. He filed his complaint June 17, 1960. This was thirty-four and one-half months after the final administrative action on his removal. The defendant officials moved to dismiss, filing in support an affidavit reciting facts which upon their face posed the problem of laches. Plaintiff filed an opposition, in which he referred to the defendants' "attempting to raise the issue of laches". The trial court entered summary judgment.

The plaintiff's case was barred by laches. The law on the point was established by United States ex rel. Arant v. Lane in 1919 and has consistently been applied by the federal courts in many cases since then. The judgment of the District Court is

E.g., Norris v. United States, 257 U.S. 77, 42 S.Ct. 9, 66 L.Ed. 136 (1921); Nicholas v. United States, 257 U.S. 71, 42 S.Ct. 7, 66 L.Ed. 133 (1921); Jones v. Summerfield, 105 U.S.App.D.C. 140, 265 F.2d 124 (D.C. Cir.), cert. denied, 361 U.S. 841, 80 S.Ct. 93, 4 L.Ed.2d 80 (1959); Drown v. Higley, 100 U.S.App. D.C. 326, 244 F.2d 774 (D.C. Cir. 1957); O'Connor v. Summerfield, 99 U.S.App. D.C. 249, 239 F.2d 69 (D.C. Cir. 1956); Haas v. Overholser, 96 U.S.App.D.C. 22, 223 F.2d 314 (D.C. Cir. 1955); Sawyer v. Stevens, 95 U.S.App.D.C. 267, 221 F.2d 822 (D.C. Cir. 1954), cert. denied, 348 U.S. 959, 75 S.Ct. 450, 99 L.Ed. 748 (1955); Davis v. Summerfield, 95 U.S.App.D.C. 78, 219 F.2d 510 (D.C. Cir.), cert. denied, 349 U.S. 965, 75 S.Ct. 898, 99 L.Ed. 1286 (1955); Grasse v. Snyder, 89 U.S.App. D.C. 352, 192 F.2d 35 (D.C. Cir. 1951); Caswell v. Morgenthau, 69 App.D.C. 15, 98 F.2d 296 (D.C. Cir.), cert. denied, 305 U.S. 596, 59 S.Ct. 81, 83 L.Ed. 378 (1938).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Chappelle v. Sharp

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
Nov 22, 1961
301 F.2d 506 (D.C. Cir. 1961)
Case details for

Chappelle v. Sharp

Case Details

Full title:Leland A. CHAPPELLE, Appellant, v. Dudley C. SHARP, Secretary of the…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit

Date published: Nov 22, 1961

Citations

301 F.2d 506 (D.C. Cir. 1961)
112 U.S. App. D.C. 182

Citing Cases

Paul v. Bier

With the same purpose of achieving substantial justice, if GWU's late cross-claim was properly denied, a…

Motto v. General Services Administration

A host of later cases have followed a similar rationale in dismissing suit brought late without reasonable…