From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chapman v. Wright Transportation

United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Southern Division
Aug 26, 2011
Civil Action No. 11-0097-CG-C (S.D. Ala. Aug. 26, 2011)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-0097-CG-C.

August 26, 2011


ORDER


After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues raised, and there having been no objections filed, the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and dated August 10, 2011 is ADOPTED as the opinion of this court.

Additionally, the motion to amend the complaint (Doc. 32) is DENIED AS MOOT for the reasons expressed in the report and recommendation, and because the additional cause of action the plaintiff wishes to allege in an amended complaint is a state cause of action over which the court does not have jurisdiction.

DONE and ORDERED


Summaries of

Chapman v. Wright Transportation

United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Southern Division
Aug 26, 2011
Civil Action No. 11-0097-CG-C (S.D. Ala. Aug. 26, 2011)
Case details for

Chapman v. Wright Transportation

Case Details

Full title:KENNETH CHAPMAN, Plaintiff, v. WRIGHT TRANSPORTATION, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Southern Division

Date published: Aug 26, 2011

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-0097-CG-C (S.D. Ala. Aug. 26, 2011)

Citing Cases

Babcock v. Harrsch

We agree with the contention of plaintiffs in error that the action of debt is a proper form of action for…