From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chapman v. Atlantic Transportation Co.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
Oct 14, 1952
21 N.J. Super. 589 (App. Div. 1952)

Opinion

Argued September 15, 1952 —

Decided October 14, 1952.

Appeal from the Essex County Court, Law Division, Conlon, J.C.C.

Affirmed.

Before Judges JAYNE, PROCTOR and SCHETTINO.

Mr. Aaron Gordon argued the cause for the petitioner-respondent ( Mr. Carl Gelman, attorney).

Mr. Robert Shaw argued the cause for the respondent-appellant ( Messrs. Shaw, Hughes Pindar, attorneys).


The judgment is affirmed for the reason expressed in the opinion of Judge Conlon in 17 N.J. Super. 285 ( Cty. Ct. 1952). When the proofs support the findings of fact by two concurring tribunals, as in this case, we do not lightly disturb such finding, and after a thorough examination of the proofs we are satisfied that the findings below were correct. Wright v. Westinghouse Electric Mfg. Co., 134 N.J.L. 581 , 583 ( Sup. Ct. 1946), affirmed 135 N.J.L. 460 ( E. A. 1947).

Further, we find no merit in appellant's contention here that temporary disability should not have been awarded for any periods beyond February 20, 1950, the date of petitioner's discharge from the Passaic General Hospital. Following his discharge from the Passaic General Hospital, petitioner continued to be under the care of Dr. Somberg. On April 10, 1950, on Dr. Somberg's recommendation, he was admitted to the Hospital for Crippled Children. On April 18, 1950, the doctor performed a bilateral trephine operation upon him. Petitioner was discharged April 23, 1950, the date the deputy director found the temporary disability terminated. It was not established that further improvement was improbable until the operation at the Hospital for Crippled Children confirmed Dr. Somberg's clinical opinion of the nature and extent of petitioner's disability. Disability should be "deemed to be temporary until after a course of treatment and observation it is discovered to be permanent, and that fact is duly established." Reynolds v. Passaic Valley Sewerage Commrs., 130 N.J.L. 437 , 444 ( Sup. Ct. 1943), affirmed on opinion below 131 N.J.L. 327 ( E. A. 1944); see also Monaco v. Albert Maund, Inc., 17 N.J. Super. 425 ( App. Div. 1952).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Chapman v. Atlantic Transportation Co.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
Oct 14, 1952
21 N.J. Super. 589 (App. Div. 1952)
Case details for

Chapman v. Atlantic Transportation Co.

Case Details

Full title:WALTER P. CHAPMAN, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. ATLANTIC TRANSPORTATION CO.…

Court:Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division

Date published: Oct 14, 1952

Citations

21 N.J. Super. 589 (App. Div. 1952)
91 A.2d 502

Citing Cases

Jackson Ready-Mix Concrete v. Young

B. The appellee's right to compensation under the original award is res adjudicata of the matter before the…

Hodgdon v. Project Packaging, Inc.

Petitioner is entitled to temporary disability benefits when unable to work until his disability is found to…