From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chao v. Chin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 28, 1975
47 A.D.2d 941 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)

Opinion

April 28, 1975


Appeal by plaintiff (1) from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated August 22, 1974, which granted defendant Chin's motion to disqualify plaintiff's attorney from acting as such attorney, and (2) from so much of a further order of the same court, dated December 3, 1974, as (a) denied the branch of a motion by plaintiff as sought leave to renew opposition to said motion by defendant Chin and (b) upon reargument, adhered to the original decision. Appeal from order dated August 22, 1974 dismissed as academic. That order was superseded by the order made on reargument. Order dated December 3, 1974, reversed insofar as appealed from, plaintiff's motion granted and defendant's motion denied. Plaintiff is awarded one bill of $20 costs and disbursements against defendant Chin to cover both appeals. Defendant Chin lacked standing to challenge plaintiff's representation by Brooklyn Legal Services Corporation B (Not-For-Profit Corporation Law, § 114; see, also, Matter of Legal Aid Soc. of Nassau County v Samenga, 39 A.D.2d 912). Rabin, Acting P.J., Hopkins, Brennan and Munder, JJ., concur; Shapiro, J., concurs in result. [ 78 Misc.2d 1055.]


Summaries of

Chao v. Chin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 28, 1975
47 A.D.2d 941 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)
Case details for

Chao v. Chin

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM CHAO, Appellant, v. BRYNITTA CHIN, Respondent, et al., Defendants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 28, 1975

Citations

47 A.D.2d 941 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)

Citing Cases

Promanagement Associates v. DeMott

Before: Nardelli, J.P., Tom, Mazzarelli, Saxe, Friedman, JJ. Plaintiff, a construction manager under contract…

Felder v. Foster

The defendants' reliance upon fee-generation restrictions that may be imposed upon Legal Assistance by State…