From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Champlain Stone and Sand Company v. the St. of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 19, 1912
98 N.E. 1100 (N.Y. 1912)

Opinion

Argued March 8, 1912

Decided March 19, 1912

L.B. McKelvey and James McPhillips for appellant.

Thomas Carmody, Attorney-General ( Wilber W. Chambers of counsel), for respondent.


Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the ground that under the Artillery Patent the bed of Wood creek was excepted and the title thereto remained in the crown and thereafter passed to the state; no opinion.

Concur: CULLEN, Ch. J., GRAY, VANN, WILLARD BARTLETT, HISCOCK, CHASE and COLLIN, JJ.


Summaries of

Champlain Stone and Sand Company v. the St. of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 19, 1912
98 N.E. 1100 (N.Y. 1912)
Case details for

Champlain Stone and Sand Company v. the St. of New York

Case Details

Full title:CHAMPLAIN STONE AND SAND COMPANY, Appellant, v . THE STATE OF NEW YORK…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Mar 19, 1912

Citations

98 N.E. 1100 (N.Y. 1912)
98 N.E. 1100

Citing Cases

Whitehall W.P. Co., Ltd. v. Atlantic, G. P. Co.

There are two plaintiffs herein, but in speaking of the "plaintiff" I shall refer to the Whitehall Water…

Maher v. Commonwealth

State v. Carragan, 7 Vroom, 52. Compare Junius Construction Corp. v. Cohen, 257 N.Y. 393, 399, and Suncrest…