From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chamber of Commerce of U.S. v. Lockyer

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jan 17, 2006
435 F.3d 999 (9th Cir. 2006)

Opinion

Nos. 03-55166, 03-55169.

January 17, 2006.

Stephen A. Bokat, Esq., National Chamber Litigation Center, Bradley W. Kampas, Esq., Washington, DC, Scott W. Oborne, Esq., Jackson Lewis LLP, Mark A. Johnson, Esq., Mark E. Reagan, Esq., Hooper. Lundy Bookman, Inc., San Francisco, CA, for Plaintiffs-Appellees.

Scott A. Kronland, Esq., Altshuler Berzon Nussbaum Rubin Demain, San Francisco, CA, for Intervenors.

Suzanne M. Ambrose, DAG, AGCA — Office of the California Attorney General, Department of Justice, Sacramento, CA, Richard T. Waldow, DAG, AGCA — Office of the California Attorney General, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendants-Appellants.

Before: SCHROEDER, Chief Judge.


ORDER

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.

Judge Berzon is recused.


Summaries of

Chamber of Commerce of U.S. v. Lockyer

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jan 17, 2006
435 F.3d 999 (9th Cir. 2006)
Case details for

Chamber of Commerce of U.S. v. Lockyer

Case Details

Full title:CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES; California Chamber of Commerce…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Jan 17, 2006

Citations

435 F.3d 999 (9th Cir. 2006)

Citing Cases

Chamber of Commerce of U.S. v. Lockyer

On rehearing, a divided panel issued a second opinion, Chamber of Commerce v. Lockyer, 422 F.3d 973 (9th…