holding that district court properly denied award of attorney's fees where the plaintiff "failed to prove that it suffered any damages whatsoever"
Summary of this case from Liberty Counsel, Inc. v. Ohio Liberty Council Corp.Nos. 99-6268, 99-6269.
Decided and Filed: December 20, 2000.
Appeal from the E.D.Tenn.; Appealing after remand 225 F.3d 659.
AFFIRMED.
holding that district court properly denied award of attorney's fees where the plaintiff "failed to prove that it suffered any damages whatsoever"
Summary of this case from Liberty Counsel, Inc. v. Ohio Liberty Council Corp.upholding the dismissal of claims that the Pentagon developed and released the AIDS virus on the American public
Summary of this case from Lotton v. United Statesaffirming district court's dismissal of claims against certain defendants for failing to allege their personal involvement in the claimed denial of his rights
Summary of this case from Meadows v. Sutulaaffirming a district court's dismissal of a pro se plaintiff's complaint "because he did not allege personal involvement by either of these defendants in the alleged denial of his rights"
Summary of this case from Abdel-Fares v. Terrisaffirming a district court's dismissal of a pro se plaintiff's complaint "because he did not allege personal involvement by either of these defendants in the alleged denial of his rights"
Summary of this case from Sheets v. Cnty. of Wayneaffirming dismissal of § 1981 claim and concluding that "[b]ecause the Dispatch cannot be compelled by a federal court to publish the plaintiffs' letters and cannot be ordered to pay damages to the plaintiffs for the failure to publish their letters, the plaintiffs' complaint fails to state a claim for relief"
Summary of this case from Melvin v. U.S.A. Todayrecognizing that the Postmaster General is the only proper defendant in a Title VII action brought by an aggrieved employee
Summary of this case from Folley v. Hendersondefining willful conduct as conduct "knowingly taken by one subject to the statutory provisions in disregard of the action's legality"
Summary of this case from Pearson v. U.S. Dept. of Agriculturerequiring allegations of personal involvement for each defendant
Summary of this case from Wallace v. Leerequiring allegations of personal involvement for each defendant
Summary of this case from Harris v. Forresterrequiring allegations of personal involvement for each defendant
Summary of this case from Fisk v. Warren Cnty. Sheriff's Dep'trequiring allegations of personal involvement for each defendant
Summary of this case from Pierce v. Hamptonconstruing a pro se motion "based on the well-settled precept that the petitions of pro se litigants are held to an especially liberal standard"
Summary of this case from Kotwal v. TranFull title:JEFFREY CHAIN, L.P. v. TROPODYNE CORP
Court:United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Date published: Dec 20, 2000
See 7 U.S.C. § 2146 ; 9 C.F.R. § 2.3(a) ; Marshall v. Barlow's, Inc., 436 U.S. 307, 322 n. 19, 98 S.Ct. 1816,…
Midwest Retailer Associated v. City of ToledoSeeContreras v. City of Chi., 920 F.Supp. 1370, 1389 (N.D. Ill. 1996) (noting that "[t]he food industry has…