From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chaganti v. Sun Microsystems

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California
Nov 23, 2004
C 03-05785 CRB (N.D. Cal. Nov. 23, 2004)

Summary

awarding $12 per day for total award of $2,292 based on lack of bad faith by defendant and minimal prejudice suffered by plaintiff

Summary of this case from Phipps v. Tileco Employee Benefit Plan

Opinion


NAREN CHAGANTI, Plaintiff, v. SUN MICROSYSTEMS, et al., Defendants. No. C 03-05785 CRB United States District Court, N.D. California. November 23, 2004

          JUDGMENT

          CHARLES BREYER, District Judge.

         The Court having granted defendant Ceridian's motion for summary judgment on all claims, and defendant Sun's motion for summary judgment on the federal wrongful termination claims, by Memorandum and Order dated August 23, 2004, and having granted Sun's motion for summary judgment on plaintiff's claims that his COBRA benefits were unlawfully terminated and dismissed the remaining state law claims by Memorandum and Order dated November 23, 2004, and having entered judgment in favor of plaintiff on his COBRA notification claim by Memorandum and Order dated November 23, 2004, judgment is entered in favor of Ceridian on all claims, and in favor of Sun on plaintiff's federal wrongful termination claims and COBRA/ERISA claims for wrongful termination of benefits. Judgment is entered in favor of plaintiff in the amount of $2292.00 on his claim that Sun failed to provide him with timely notice of his COBRA rights.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Chaganti v. Sun Microsystems

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California
Nov 23, 2004
C 03-05785 CRB (N.D. Cal. Nov. 23, 2004)

awarding $12 per day for total award of $2,292 based on lack of bad faith by defendant and minimal prejudice suffered by plaintiff

Summary of this case from Phipps v. Tileco Employee Benefit Plan
Case details for

Chaganti v. Sun Microsystems

Case Details

Full title:NAREN CHAGANTI, Plaintiff, v. SUN MICROSYSTEMS, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California

Date published: Nov 23, 2004

Citations

C 03-05785 CRB (N.D. Cal. Nov. 23, 2004)

Citing Cases

Zavislak v. Netflix, Inc.

181. However, bearing in mind that “[t]he Ninth Circuit has mandated that district courts should liberally…

Phipps v. Tileco Employee Benefit Plan

See Hemphill, 619 F. Supp.2d at 977 (awarding $50 a day from June 6, 1996 through September 25, 2005); see…