From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Certiorari Granted

U.S.
Jan 8, 2001
531 U.S. 1075 (2001)

Opinion

JANUARY 8, 2001


00-684 JANIK ET UX., ON BEHALF OF JANIK ET AL. v. CITY OF DALLAS. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 226 F.3d 641.

00-687 PURSLEY v. ROBERTS ET AL. Super. Ct. Pa. Certiorari denied.

00-688 ALEXANDRIA RESIDENT COUNCIL, INC. v. ALEXANDRIA REDEVELOPMENT AND HOUSING AUTHORITY. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 218 F.3d 307.

00-693 HAMZAVI v. COUNCIL OF UNIT OWNERS OF CAROUSEL CENTER CONDOMINIUMS, INC. Ct. Sp. App. Md. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 129 Md. App. 708.

00-694 DOHERTY ET AL. v. AMERICAN HOME PRODUCTS CORP. C.A. 2nd Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 216 F.3d 1071.

00-695 MUSSER v. SALOMON/SMITH BARNEY, INC. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 208 F.3d 221.

00-696 FROEBEL v. MEYER ET AL. C.A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 217 F.3d 928.

00-697 TURNER v. WARNER BROTHERS STUDIO ET AL. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

00-699 GREENBERG v. BEAR, STEARNS CO. ET AL. C.A.2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 220 F.3d 22.

00-700 GRAY v. ST. MARTIN'S PRESS, INC., ET AL. C.A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 221 F.3d 243.

00-702 JUDGE v. HATCH ET AL. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 208 F.3d 221.

00-703 KATES v. OHIO. Ct. App. Ohio, Mahoning County. Certiorari denied.

00-706 HOGAN MANAGEMENT SERVICES v. MARTINO, DBA NORTH GEORGIA ORTHOPAEDICS. Ct. App. Ga. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 242 Ga. App. 791, 530 S.E.2d 508.

00-708 HENDERSON ET AL. v. SIMMS ET AL. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 223 F.3d 267.


Summaries of

Certiorari Granted

U.S.
Jan 8, 2001
531 U.S. 1075 (2001)
Case details for

Certiorari Granted

Case Details

Full title:CERTIORARI GRANTED

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jan 8, 2001

Citations

531 U.S. 1075 (2001)

Citing Cases

Hoeft v. MVL Group, Inc.

Through the combination of legislation and common law, narrow standards of reviewing arbitration awards have…

Westerbeke Corp. v. Daihatsu Motor Co. Ltd.

Moreover, the term `disregard' implies that the arbitrator appreciates the existence of a clearly governing…