From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Certiorari Granted

U.S.
Jan 8, 2001
531 U.S. 1080 (2001)

Opinion

JANUARY 8, 2001


00-890 REED v. UNITED STATES. C.A. Armed Forces. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 54 M. J. 37.

00-892 CORUGEDO PARTAGAS v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 233 F.3d 579

00-894 McKINNEY v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 228 F.3d 413.

00-897 GALAN, AKA PRADO v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

00-899 HAAS v. DAIMLER-CHRYSLER CORP. ET AL. Ct. App. Minn. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 611 N.W.2d 382.

00-900 FULTZ v. ABB POWER T D, INC., ET AL. C.A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 210 F.3d 374.

00-901 HILTON v. CITY OF WHEELING ET AL. C.A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 209 F.3d 1005.

00-903 BLITCH v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 221 F.3d 1357.

00-912 FOWLKES v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.

00-918 MANGIERI v. MANGIERI, EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF MANGIERI. C.A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 226 F.3d 1.

00-5029 LEGREE v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 205 F.3d 724.

00-5446 MARTINEZ-LOPEZ v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 218 F.3d 743.

00-5485 CORTEZ v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 217 F.3d 847.

00-5529 ALAHMAD v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 211 F.3d 538.

00-5532 FELIPE GERMOSA v. UNITED STATES. C.A.2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 199 F.3d 1324.

00-5591 VILLARREAL v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 213 F.3d 645.


Summaries of

Certiorari Granted

U.S.
Jan 8, 2001
531 U.S. 1080 (2001)
Case details for

Certiorari Granted

Case Details

Full title:CERTIORARI GRANTED

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jan 8, 2001

Citations

531 U.S. 1080 (2001)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Miller

o existence after the events that the evidence is proffered to prove does not render the evidence irrelevant.…

U.S. v. Mackey

" [Doc. 87]. "A motion pursuant to § 3582(c) `is not a do-over of an original sentencing proceeding where a…