From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Oct 10, 2000
531 U.S. 929 (2000)

Summary

holding that the lack of jurisdiction prevented addressing the merits of the appeal since such a discussion "could only be an advisory opinion"

Summary of this case from Hohn v. United States

Opinion

OCTOBER 10, 2000


00-257 McDONALD v. TENNESSEE Sup.Ct. Tenn. Certiorari denied.

00-266 AUSTIN v. HANOVER INSURANCE CO. ET AL. C.A.2d Cir. Certiorari denied.

00-271 GENERAL DYNAMICS CORP. v. WILLIAMSON ET AL. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 208 F.3d 1144.

00-272 LIVERMAN v. HYDE ET AL. C.A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 221 F.3d 1352.

00-274 LOWRY, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS GUARDIAN AD LITEM OF LOWRY, A MINOR v. McDONNELL-DOUGLAS CORP. C.A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 211 F.3d 457.

00-284 ALIKHANI v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 200 F.3d 732.

00-290 WYSHAK v. STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA. Sup.Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied.

00-291 SMALL BUSINESS ASSISTANCE CORP. v. CLEAR CHANNEL BROADCASTING, INC., ET AL C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 210 F.3d 278.

00-293 VINSON ET AL. v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT MISSISSIPPI. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

00-294 BONNER v. TEXAS. Ct. App. Tex., 1st Dist. Certiorari denied.

00-295 SIDDIQUI v. NORTHERN TELECOM, INC. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.

00-296 KALLEMBACH v. BECHTOLT, DBA, PRESIDENT, VILLAGE OF SOUTH WAYNE, ET AL. C.A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.

00-300 SOLDIERS OF JESUS CHRIST, INC. v. LABOR AND INDUSTRY REVIEW COMMISSION ET AL. Ct. App. Wis. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 231 Wis.2d 721, 605 N.W.2d 664.

00-304 CAMMARANO v. MOORE, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 214 F.3d 1354.


Summaries of

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Oct 10, 2000
531 U.S. 929 (2000)

holding that the lack of jurisdiction prevented addressing the merits of the appeal since such a discussion "could only be an advisory opinion"

Summary of this case from Hohn v. United States

noting that delay will usually be minimal and prejudice negligible so "the focus must be upon the nature of the neglect"

Summary of this case from Jackson v. U.S.
Case details for

Certiorari Denied

Case Details

Full title:CERTIORARI DENIED

Court:U.S.

Date published: Oct 10, 2000

Citations

531 U.S. 929 (2000)

Citing Cases

Bennett v. U.S.

The time limits in Fed.R.App.P. 4 for filing a notice of appeal in the district court are mandatory and…

Young v. U.S.

The standard for coram nobis relief is high, with the court's jurisdiction being limited to review of errors…