From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Mar 4, 2002
535 U.S. 905 (2002)

Opinion

March 4, 2002.


No. 01-827 PHILLIPS, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT OF KIN TO PHILLIPS, ET AL. v. HILLCREST MEDICAL CENTER, ET AL. C.A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 244 F.3d 790.

No. 01-916 MILLER v. HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT. Ct. App. Tex., 1st Dist. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 52 S.W.3d 676.

No. 01-918 VENETIAN CASINO RESORT, L.L.C., v. LOCAL JOINT EXECUTIVE BOARD OF LAS VEGAS ET AL. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 257 F.3d 937.

No. 01-924 JOHNSON v. CITY OF SAN ANTONIO. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 273 F.3d 1094.

No. 01-925 ABGN SALES, INC. v. HURT. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 10 Fed. Appx. 623.

No. 01-926 BURCHER v. QUINCY HILL TOWNHOUSE ASSN. ET AL. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 19 Fed. Appx. 789.

No. 01-934 CHEATWOOD v. VIRGINIA. Sup.Ct. Va. Certiorari denied.

No. 01-937 VAN SLYKE v. NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORP. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 17 Fed. Appx. 154.

No. 01-938 SCHMIDT v. LOUISIANA. Ct. App. La., 3d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 771 So.2d 131.

No. 01-944 SPRADLEY ET AL. v. OLD HARMONY BAPTIST CHURCH ET AL. Dist.Ct.App. Fla., 1st Dist. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 793 So.2d 938.

No. 01-951 FORNER ET AL. v. ALLENDALE CHARTER TOWNSHIP. Ct. App. Mich. Certiorari denied.

No. 01-956 UNITED STATES EX REL. KING v. HILLCREST HEALTH CENTER, INC., ET AL. C.A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 264 F.3d 1271.

No. 01-957 WARE v. ILLINOIS. App. Ct. Ill., 1st Dist. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 323 Ill. App.3d 47, 751 N.E.2d 81.


Summaries of

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Mar 4, 2002
535 U.S. 905 (2002)
Case details for

Certiorari Denied

Case Details

Full title:CERTIORARI DENIED

Court:U.S.

Date published: Mar 4, 2002

Citations

535 U.S. 905 (2002)

Citing Cases

State v. Hood

However, in the majority of cases, this court has found an "implied waiver" analysis to be appropriate. See…

State v. C.S.D.

However, in the majority of cases, this court has found an "implied waiver" analysis to be appropriate. See…