From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
May 28, 2002
535 U.S. 1105 (2002)

Summary

Finding that the BOP's interpretation "establishes an effective and fair prorating scheme, enabling inmates to calculate with reasonable certainty the end of their imprisonment, while preventing certain prisoners from receiving disproportionate good time credits merely because their sentence happens to equal a year and a day."

Summary of this case from Jackson v. Adams

Opinion

MAY 28, 2002


No. 01-9486 HANSEN v. LAYTNER ET AL. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 31 Fed. Appx. 939.

No. 01-9487 HAWKINS v. MAHONEY, WARDEN. Sup.Ct. Mont. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 308 Mont. 394, 40 P.3d 1001.

No. 01-9534 ZARYCHTA v. TEXAS. Ct. App. Tex., 14th Dist. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 44 S.W.3d 155.

No. 01-9617 KESSLER v. TEXAS. Ct. App. Tex., 5th Dist. Certiorari denied.

No. 01-9653 MURPHY v. UNITED STATES. C.A. D.C. Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 01-9697 LEVENITE ET AL. v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 277 F.3d 454.

No. 01-9748 LUERSEN v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 278 F.3d 772.

No. 01-9764 MILES v. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS. C.A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 17 Fed. Appx. 993.

No. 01-9767 BOYD v. T'KACH. C.A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 26 Fed. Appx. 792.

No. 01-9768 SAVAGE v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 25 Fed. Appx. 280.

No. 01-9797 LOVE v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 31 Fed. Appx. 928.

No. 01-9799 LIRIANO v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 31 Fed. Appx. 929.

No. 01-9808 GUILLEN v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 31 Fed. Appx. 928.

No. 01-9809 PACHECO-CAMACHO v. HOOD, WARDEN. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 272 F.3d 1266.

No. 01-9810 SAYES v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 281 F.3d 168.

No. 01-9813 BUCKLAND v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 277 F.3d 1173.


Summaries of

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
May 28, 2002
535 U.S. 1105 (2002)

Finding that the BOP's interpretation "establishes an effective and fair prorating scheme, enabling inmates to calculate with reasonable certainty the end of their imprisonment, while preventing certain prisoners from receiving disproportionate good time credits merely because their sentence happens to equal a year and a day."

Summary of this case from Jackson v. Adams

upholding facial constitutionality of § 841

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Nakata

stating that the defendant must show that he made immunized statements regarding matters related to the federal prosecution

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Martin
Case details for

Certiorari Denied

Case Details

Full title:CERTIORARI DENIED

Court:U.S.

Date published: May 28, 2002

Citations

535 U.S. 1105 (2002)
122 S. Ct. 2314

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Martin

Under Murphy v. Waterfront Commission and Kastigar federal prosecutors are prohibited from using immunized…

U.S. v. Carillo

See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2). The case was originally set for submission without argument on July 12, 2001,…