From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Feb 19, 2002
534 U.S. 1130 (2002)

Summary

noting the "requirement that a plaintiff establish a discriminatory discharge in order to receive lost pay"

Summary of this case from FORD v. LOCO, INC.

Opinion

FEBRUARY 19, 2002


No. 01-799. GREENE v. TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 265 F.3d 369.

No. 01-809. McKENZIE v. MUTUAL OF ENUMCLAW INSURANCE CO. Ct. App. Wash. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 104 Wash. App. 1049.

No. 01-810. MOLDO, CHAPTER 7 TRUSTEE, ESTATE OF CYBERNETIC SERVICES, INC., v. MATSCO, INC., ET AL. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 252 F.3d 1039.

No. 01-811. McMAHON v. CONNECTICUT. Sup.Ct. Conn. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 257 Conn. 544, 778 A.2d 847.

No. 01-814. HUNTER v. WEST LINN-WILSONVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT 3JT. Ct. App. Ore. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 173 Or. App. 514, 22 P.3d 1235.

No. 01-815. OVERBY ET VIR v. WITSO. Sup.Ct. Minn. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 627 N.W.2d 63.

No. 01-818. ESTATE OF BISHOP, FKA BISHOP, DBA ESSENCE OF LIFE v. EQUINOX INTERNATIONAL CORP. C.A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 256 F.3d 1050.

No. 01-819. ROWE ET AL. v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. Sup.Ct. N.C. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 353 N.C. 671, 549 S.E.2d 203.

No. 01-822. KELLER v. WASHINGTON. Sup.Ct. Wash. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 143 Wn.2d 267, 19 P.3d 1030.

No. 01-825. TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION No. 293 v. TRUSERV CORP., FKA COTTER CO., ET AL. C.A. D.C. Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 254 F.3d 1105.

No. 01-829. HERTZBERG v. SRAM CORP. C.A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 261 F.3d 1105.

No. 01-832. BALANAY v. SUE-NOGUCHI. Sup.Ct. Haw. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 96 Haw. 72, 26 P.3d 30.

No. 01-833. TSUI ET UX. v. TOLZ, AS TRUSTEE FOR SHERIDAN, ET AL. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 273 F.3d 1114.


Summaries of

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Feb 19, 2002
534 U.S. 1130 (2002)

noting the "requirement that a plaintiff establish a discriminatory discharge in order to receive lost pay"

Summary of this case from FORD v. LOCO, INC.
Case details for

Certiorari Denied

Case Details

Full title:CERTIORARI DENIED

Court:U.S.

Date published: Feb 19, 2002

Citations

534 U.S. 1130 (2002)

Citing Cases

State v. Hamlin

In his brief, the defendant posits that "in every case where the state proves the offense of assault in the…

Dorman v. Steffen

Appellant argues that the district court erred because (a) respondent-husband is the presumed father of the…