From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Apr 23, 2001
532 U.S. 994 (2001)

Summary

reversing district court's holding that it lacked jurisdiction to award attorneys' fees after dismissal of action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, because "courts that lack jurisdiction with respect to one kind of decision may have it with respect to another."

Summary of this case from Correspondent Services Corp. v. J.V.W. Investment Ltd.

Opinion

APRIL 23, 2001


No. 00-1030. LEE v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 230 F.3d 1355.

No. 00-1146. STEEL CO., AKA CHICAGO STEEL PICKLING CO. v. CITIZENS FOR A BETTER ENVIRONMENT. C.A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 230 F.3d 923.

No. 00-1155. BUTCHER ET VIR, CO-PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVES OF THE ESTATE OF BUTCHER, DECEASED, ET AL. v. BLACHY ET AL.; and

No. 00-1345. BLACHY ET AL. v. BUTCHER ET VIR, CO-PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVES OF THE ESTATE OF BUTCHER, DECEASED, ET AL. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 221 F.3d 896.

No. 00-1159. DOWNS v. LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 228 F.3d 1003.

No. 00-1170. HORNKOHL, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC SAFETY FOR CITY OF MANISTEE, ET AL. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 234 F.3d 1267.

No. 00-1180. GARRISON, PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATES OF GARRISON ET AL. v. POLISAR ET AL. C.A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 229 F.3d 1163.

No. 00-1181. ARIZONA v. HOWELL. Ct. App. Ariz. Certiorari denied.

No. 00-1240. TRI-STATE COACH LINES, INC., ET AL. v. METROPOLITAN PIER AND EXPOSITION AUTHORITY. App. Ct. Ill., 1st Dist. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 315 Ill. App.3d 179, 732 N.E.2d 1137.

No. 00-1330. FRIEDEMANN v. MCCORMICK ET AL. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 229 F.3d 1157.

No. 00-1333. MOORE ET AL. v. LYNAUGH, FORMER DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION, ET AL. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 235 F.3d 1339.

No. 00-1336. KING v. OHIO. Ct. App. Ohio, Medina County. Certiorari denied.


Summaries of

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Apr 23, 2001
532 U.S. 994 (2001)

reversing district court's holding that it lacked jurisdiction to award attorneys' fees after dismissal of action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, because "courts that lack jurisdiction with respect to one kind of decision may have it with respect to another."

Summary of this case from Correspondent Services Corp. v. J.V.W. Investment Ltd.

applying similar reasoning in considering whether postings to school bulletin boards were government or private speech

Summary of this case from Sons of Confederate Veterans, Inc. v. Commissioner of the Virginia Department of Motor Vehicles
Case details for

Certiorari Denied

Case Details

Full title:CERTIORARI DENIED

Court:U.S.

Date published: Apr 23, 2001

Citations

532 U.S. 994 (2001)

Citing Cases

TBI, INC. v. COMMUNICATION CONSULTING SERVICES, INC.

Defendant prevailed in the proceeding in this court in that the case was dismissed, essentially for lack of…

Southern-Owners Insurance Company v. Tomac of Florida

Indeed, Kona is not the first court to collapse jurisdictional analysis with "prevailing party" analysis to…