From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Oct 30, 2000
531 U.S. 960 (2000)

Summary

holding that the state did not effect a taking of a party's property when the takings claim was "predicated on the loss of a right" that the party "never possessed, namely, the 'right' to discharge mining wastes into the waters of the state"

Summary of this case from State v. Waters

Opinion

OCTOBER 30, 2000


00-368 KISSI v. SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION ET AL. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 203 F.3d 821.

00-371 LeBLANC v. SALEM. C.A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 212 F.3d 632.

00-372 LAL v. GOUERT. Super. Ct. Pa. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 748 A.2d 782.

00-380 BURNS v. ADA S. McKINLEY COMMUNITY SERVICE ET AL. App. Ct. Ill., 1st Dist. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 308 Ill. App.3d 1086, 764 N.E.2d 186.

00-413 YATES v. GOBER, ACTING SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS. C.A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 213 F.3d 1372.

00-420 SAMPSON v. YELLOW CAB CO. ET AL. C.A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.

00-424 SIMPSON v. COLUMBUS SOUTHERN POWER CO. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 211 F.3d 1270.

00-430 FORD MOTOR CO. ET AL. v. KING, ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF KING ET AL. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 209 F.3d 886.

00-431 KINROSS COPPER CORP. v. OREGON. Ct. App. Ore. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 160 Or. App. 513, 981 P.2d 833.

00-437 KEITH, AS REPRESENTATIVE PLAINTIFF FOR KEITH ET UX. v. RIZZUTO. C.A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 212 F.3d 1190.

00-450 CHUN HUA MUI ET AL. v. UNION OF NEEDLETRADES, INDUSTRIAL AND TEXTILES EMPLOYEES, ALF-CIO, ET AL. C.A.2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 213 F.3d 626.

00-460 FOWLER v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 216 F.3d 459.

00-465 MURRAY v. GREYHOUND LINES, INC. (GLI). C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 216 F.3d 1092.


Summaries of

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Oct 30, 2000
531 U.S. 960 (2000)

holding that the state did not effect a taking of a party's property when the takings claim was "predicated on the loss of a right" that the party "never possessed, namely, the 'right' to discharge mining wastes into the waters of the state"

Summary of this case from State v. Waters
Case details for

Certiorari Denied

Case Details

Full title:CERTIORARI DENIED

Court:U.S.

Date published: Oct 30, 2000

Citations

531 U.S. 960 (2000)

Citing Cases

State v. Waters

We reject that argument without written discussion. SeeKinross Copper Corp. v. State of Oregon, 160 Or App…

Roberts ex Rel. Johnson v. Galen of Virginia

The decision not to impose sanctions is reviewed for an abuse of discretion. See King v. Ford Motor Co., 209…