From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Oct 1, 2001
534 U.S. 814 (2001)

Summary

holding that, in the future, " prosecutor acting without a grand jury must first seek leave of court before issuing a subpoena duces tecum to a third party for the production of documentary evidence"

Summary of this case from State v. Eichhorst

Opinion

OCTOBER 1, 2001


No. 00-1588 OMAN v. INDIANA. Sup.Ct. Ind. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 737 N.E.2d 1131.

No. 00-1597 ECOBAN FINANCE LTD. v. GRUPO ACERERO DEL NORTE, S.A. DE C.V., ET AL. C.A.2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 2 Fed. Appx. 80.

No. 00-1598 COVEY v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 232 F.3d 641.

No. 00-1605 LEWIS v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 235 F.3d 215.

No. 00-1656 SHALTRY, BANKRUPTCY TRUSTEE, ET AL. v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 232 F.3d 1046.

No. 00-1666 GINTHER v. GINTHER TRUSTS ET AL. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 238 F.3d 686.

No. 00-1669 FLEETWOOD HOMES OF FLORIDA ET AL. v. MASSANARI, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 235 F.3d 1298.

No. 00-1674 DOW AGROSCIENCES LLC ET AL. v. SLEATH ET AL. Sup.Ct. Mont. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 304 Mont. 1, 16 P.3d 1042.

No. 00-1680 PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE CO. ET AL. v. WAYNE ET AL. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 238 F.3d 1048.

No. 00-1682 TRIGALET ET AL., PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVES OF THE ESTATE OF TRIGALET, ET AL. v. CITY OF TULSA. C.A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 239 F.3d 1050.

No. 00-1683 CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY INTERNATIONAL v. TIME WARNER, INC., ET AL. C.A.2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 238 F.3d 168.

No. 00-1685 OKLAHOMA EX REL. TAL ET AL v. CITY OF OKLAHOMA CITY ET AL. Sup.Ct. Okla. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 19 P.3d 268.

No. 00-1687 ALLNUTT, AKA SOVEREIGN EQUIPMENT CO. ET AL. v. FRIEDMAN, CHAPTER 11 TRUSTEE FOR THE BANKRUPTCY ESTATES OF ALLNUTT. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 238 F.3d 410.


Summaries of

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Oct 1, 2001
534 U.S. 814 (2001)

holding that, in the future, " prosecutor acting without a grand jury must first seek leave of court before issuing a subpoena duces tecum to a third party for the production of documentary evidence"

Summary of this case from State v. Eichhorst
Case details for

Certiorari Denied

Case Details

Full title:CERTIORARI DENIED

Court:U.S.

Date published: Oct 1, 2001

Citations

534 U.S. 814 (2001)

Citing Cases

Wright v. Oklahoma Corp.

State ex rel Moshe Tal v. City of Oklahoma City, 2002 OK 97, 18, 61 P.3d 234, 241 ( Tal TV), citing City of…

Tulsa Industrial Authority v. City of Tulsa

Our recent opinions involving a public body seeking a declaratory judgment to judicially validate its actions…