From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Jun 16, 2003
539 U.S. 934 (2003)

Opinion

JUNE 16, 2003.


No. 02-10509. HARRELL v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 02-10512. FOSTER v. PAINTER, WARDEN. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 55 Fed. Appx. 172.

No. 02-10516. HATFIELD v. FOX, WARDEN. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 54 Fed. Appx. 161.

No. 02-10552. KORNAFEL v. UNITED STATES. C.A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 55 Fed. Appx. 551.

No. 02-10588. MERCADO v. ILLINOIS. App. Ct. Ill., 1st Dist. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 333 Ill. App.3d 994, 777 N.E.2d 641.

No. 02-10591. EDMONSON v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 57 Fed. Appx. 212.

No. 02-10592. ERNESTO CRUZ v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 61 Fed. Appx. 121.

No. 02-10597. PEARL v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 324 F.3d 1210.

No. 02-10598. KEEPER v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 49 Fed. Appx. 666.

No. 02-10599. MARQUINA v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 02-10604. WILLIAMS v. ILLINOIS. App. Ct. Ill., 1st Dist. Certiorari denied.

No. 02-10606. VIEUX v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 02-10608. GORMAN v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 60 Fed. Appx. 14.

No. 02-10609. HERDER v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 59 Fed. Appx. 257.

No. 02-10613. TAYLOR v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 58 Fed. Appx. 972.

No. 02-10614. CALIX-ZAPATA v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 61 Fed. Appx. 121.


Summaries of

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Jun 16, 2003
539 U.S. 934 (2003)
Case details for

Certiorari Denied

Case Details

Full title:CERTIORARI DENIED

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jun 16, 2003

Citations

539 U.S. 934 (2003)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Wooten

Mr. Wooten contends the district court erred by admitting any evidence regarding the May 3 incident because:…

U.S. v. Lopez

We review the district court's findings of fact for clear error. United States v. Pearl, 324 F.3d 1210, 1215…