From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Oct 2, 2000
531 U.S. 812 (2000)

Summary

upholding district court's exclusion of plaintiff's statistical expert in disparate impact case

Summary of this case from Arredondo v. Flores

Opinion

OCTOBER 2, 2000


99-1663 DISTRICT INTOWN PROPERTIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP ET AL. v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ET AL. C.A.D.C. Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 198 F.3d 874.

99-1671 BREWER, PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF BREWER, DECEASED v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 210 F.3d 381.

99-1694 HASS v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 199 F.3d 749.

99-1722 THOMAS TRUCK LEASE, INC., ET AL. v. LEE COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI, BY AND THROUGH ITS TAX COLLECTOR, BELK. Sup.Ct. Miss. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 768 So.2d 870.

99-1723 KLAMATH DRAINAGE DISTRICT ET AL. v. PATTERSON, REGIONAL DIRECTOR, MID-PACIFIC REGION, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF RECLAMATION, ET AL. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 204 F.3d 1206.

99-1726 BATTISTA ET AL. v. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, APPOINTED RECEIVER OF BANK OF NEWPORT. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 195 F.3d 1113.

99-1731 NAHEY ET UX. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE. C.A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 196 F.3d 866.

99-1746 WATERMAN STEAMSHIP CORP. v. ANDERSON. Ct. App. La., 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.

99-1747 O'CONNELL ET UX., LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES OF THEIR DAUGHTER, O'CONNELL v. SHALALA, SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES; and

99-1749 TERRAN, AS LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE OF TERRAN, A MINOR v. SHALALA, SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES. C.A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: No. 99-1747, 217 F.3d 857; No. 99-1749, 195 F.3d 1302.

99-1750 MUNOZ ET AL. v. ORR ET AL. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 200 F.3d 291.

99-1756 GREAT WESTERN CASINOS, INC. v. MORONGO BAND OF MISSION INDIANS ET AL. Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 74 Cal.App.4th 1407, 88 Cal.Rptr.2d 828.


Summaries of

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Oct 2, 2000
531 U.S. 812 (2000)

upholding district court's exclusion of plaintiff's statistical expert in disparate impact case

Summary of this case from Arredondo v. Flores

upholding district court s exclusion of plaintiff's statistical expert in disparate impact case

Summary of this case from Coleman v. Exxon Chemical Corp.

excluding expert testimony where the expert "admitted to failing to consider other variables . . . as explanations", reasoning that the "failure to control for other explanatory variables makes an expert's [opinion] essentially worthless"

Summary of this case from Automobile Ins. Co. of Hart. v. Electrolux Home Prod
Case details for

Certiorari Denied

Case Details

Full title:CERTIORARI DENIED

Court:U.S.

Date published: Oct 2, 2000

Citations

531 U.S. 812 (2000)

Citing Cases

Wright v. Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center

As pointed out by defendants, however, "[p]arties that benefit from a government contract are generally…

Usa. v. City of La.

Rather, permissive intervention has been granted by the courts on a case-by-case basis, founded on analysis…