From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Jan 22, 2002
534 U.S. 1114 (2002)

Summary

concluding that, if an exception to the statutory prohibition does not apply, then the Declaratory Judgment Act plainly bars a federal court from declaring anything that would impede the government's ability to assess and collect taxes

Summary of this case from In Matter of Poehlmann

Opinion

JANUARY 22, 2002


No. 01-674. YANCO v. UNITED STATES. C.A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 258 F.3d 1356.

No. 01-694. STERLING CONSULTING CORP. v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 245 F.3d 1161.

No. 01-701. TACO BELL CORP. v. WRENCH LLC ET AL. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 256 F.3d 446.

No. 01-707. HANSARD v. REDDING RANCHERIA. Ct. App. Cal., 3d App. Dist. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 88 Cal.App.4th 384, 105 Cal.Rptr.2d 773.

No. 01-709. ITNX v. ALPHA BUSINESS GROUP, INC., ET AL. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 9 Fed. Appx. 780.

No. 01-710. LOGITECH, INC. v. GART. C.A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 254 F.3d 1334.

No. 01-713. SECTION 28 PARTNERSHIP, LTD. v. MARTIN COUNTY, FLORIDA. Dist.Ct.App. Fla., 4th Dist. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 772 So.2d 616.

No. 01-719. CAMPBELL ET AL. v. SEARS ROEBUCK CO. App. Ct. Ill., 3d Dist. Certiorari denied. Reported below: ___ Ill. App.3d ___, ___ N.E.2d ___.

No. 01-730. PAPA v. FAWCETT ET AL. Commw. Ct. Pa. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 767 A.2d 32.

No. 01-736. WATKINS v. ROADWAY EXPRESS, INC. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 273 F.3d 1094.

No. 01-737. TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL LIFE INSURANCE CO. v. SECURITY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OR AMERICA ET AL. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 11 Fed. Appx. 926.

No. 01-746. RATNER ET AL. v. LOUDOUN COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS ET AL. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 16 Fed. Appx. 140.

No. 01-747. SANGHVI v. ST. CATHERINE'S HOSPITAL, INC. C.A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 258 F.3d 570,


Summaries of

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Jan 22, 2002
534 U.S. 1114 (2002)

concluding that, if an exception to the statutory prohibition does not apply, then the Declaratory Judgment Act plainly bars a federal court from declaring anything that would impede the government's ability to assess and collect taxes

Summary of this case from In Matter of Poehlmann

applying Michigan law

Summary of this case from Curtis v. Herb Chambers I-95, Inc.

distinguishing between implied-in-fact contract, where there is meeting of minds of parties by words or conduct, and contract implied in law, which is not true contract but quasi contract with obligations imposed by law

Summary of this case from Curtis v. Herb Chambers I-95, Inc.
Case details for

Certiorari Denied

Case Details

Full title:CERTIORARI DENIED

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jan 22, 2002

Citations

534 U.S. 1114 (2002)

Citing Cases

Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. v. Ottawa Plant Food

See 35 U.S.C. § 287(a); see also Gart v. Logitech, Inc., 254 F.3d 1334, 1345 (Fed. Cir. 2001) ("The statute…

Network Appliance, Inc. v. Bluearc Corp.

On the other hand, where the moving party bears the burden of proof on an issue, it must submit evidence…