From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Oct 2, 2000
531 U.S. 828 (2000)

Summary

holding securities claims that "could be brought by a plaintiff with proper standing" were actionable and therefore barred

Summary of this case from Lerner v. Colman

Opinion

OCTOBER 2, 2000


99-2086 CHMURA, JUDGE, 37TH DISTRICT COURT OF MICHIGAN v. MICHIGAN JUDICIAL TENURE COMMISSION. Sup.Ct. Mich. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 461 Mich. 517, 608 N.W.2d 31.

99-2088 NEW HAMPSHIRE HEMP COUNCIL, INC., ET AL. v. MARSHALL, ACTING ADMINISTRATOR, DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION. C.A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 203 F.3d 1.

99-2089 HOWARD ET AL. v. AMERICA ONLINE, INC., ET AL. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 208 F.3d 741.

99-2091 NATIONAL LOAN INVESTORS, L. P. v. TOWN OF ORANGE ET AL. C.A.2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 204 F.3d 407.

99-2092 DICTER v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 198 F.3d 1284.

99-6681 GIBSON v. UNITED STATES; and

99-7169 COOK v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 187 F.3d 631.

99-8243 PETTY v. CARD, SUPERINTENDENT, TIPTON CORRECTIONAL CENTER. C.A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 195 F.3d 399.

99-8572 ESTRADA v. TEXAS. Ct. Crim. App. Tex. Certiorari denied.

99-8618 KAPLAN v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 204 F.3d 1116.

99-8634 DELGADO-CUEVAS v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 189 F.3d 475.

99-8667 ABERNATHY v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 204 F.3d 1116.

99-8701 MAY v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 202 F.3d 270.

99-8794 RUBI IBARRA v. TEXAS. Ct. Crim. App. Tex. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 11 S.W.3d 189.


Summaries of

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Oct 2, 2000
531 U.S. 828 (2000)

holding securities claims that "could be brought by a plaintiff with proper standing" were actionable and therefore barred

Summary of this case from Lerner v. Colman

holding that a hearsay objection failed to preserve for state appellate review complaints that the same testimony was irrelevant

Summary of this case from Amador v. Dretke

holding that securities fraud cannot be used to establish a racketeering violation under federal law

Summary of this case from Cruze v. Hudler

holding that securities fraud cannot be used to establish a racketeering violation under federal law

Summary of this case from Cruze v. Hudler

precluding RICO action where claims implicate conduct which could have been actionable securities fraud despite claimants' lack of standing to assert those claims

Summary of this case from Javitch v. First Montauk Financial Corp.
Case details for

Certiorari Denied

Case Details

Full title:CERTIORARI DENIED

Court:U.S.

Date published: Oct 2, 2000

Citations

531 U.S. 828 (2000)

Citing Cases

Symantec Corporation v. C.D. Micro, Inc.

A violation under § 1962(c) requires proof of: (1) conduct; (2) of an enterprise; (3) through a pattern; (4)…

Acro-Tech, Inc. v. the Robert Jackson Family Trust

A. Section 1962(c) (Claim One) A violation under § 1962(c) requires proof of: (1) conduct; (2) of an…