From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Jun 17, 2002
536 U.S. 922 (2002)

Summary

holding that "§ 1983 plaintiffs must clearly notify defendants of the potential for individual liability" and "clarify[ing] that reviewing the course of proceedings is the most appropriate way to determine whether such notice has been given"

Summary of this case from Buell v. Fayette Cnty. Jail

Opinion

JUNE 17, 2002


No. 01-373 POTTER, POSTMASTER GENERAL v. FITZGERALD. C.A.2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 251 F.3d 345.

No. 01-1129 PITTS ET AL. v. CITY OF KANKAKEE ET AL. C.A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 267 F.3d 592.

No. 01-1132 McBROOM ET AL. v. MOORE. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 272 F.3d 769.

No. 01-1186 VINYARD v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 266 F.3d 320.

No. 01-1188 BHUTANI ET AL. v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 266 F.3d 661.

No. 01-1233 MATO v. BALDAUF ET AL. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 267 F.3d 444.

No. 01-1234 COHEN v. UNITED STATES. C.A.2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 260 F.3d 68.

No. 01-1316 CITY OF SEATTLE v. FURFARO ET AL.; and

No. 01-1522 FURFARO ET AL. v. CITY OF SEATTLE. Sup.Ct. Wash. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 144 Wn.2d 363, 27 P.3d 1160 and 36 P.3d 1005.

No. 01-1329 NICKELL v. MEMPHIS LIGHT, GAS WATER DIVISION. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 16 Fed. Appx. 401.

No. 01-1332 SATELLITE BROADCASTING AND COMMUNICATIONS ASSN. ET AL. v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION ET AL. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 275 F.3d 337.

No. 01-1357 OHIO ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY v. NIHISER ET AL. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 269 F.3d 626.

No. 01-1362 ELAGAMY v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 281 F.3d 1279.

No. 01-1365 DANKS v. APPEL ET AL. Sup.Ct. Colo. Certiorari denied.


Summaries of

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Jun 17, 2002
536 U.S. 922 (2002)

holding that "§ 1983 plaintiffs must clearly notify defendants of the potential for individual liability" and "clarify[ing] that reviewing the course of proceedings is the most appropriate way to determine whether such notice has been given"

Summary of this case from Buell v. Fayette Cnty. Jail

holding that "§ 1983 plaintiffs must clearly notify defendants of the potential for individual liability" and "clarify[ing] that reviewing the course of proceedings is the most appropriate way to determine whether such notice has been given"

Summary of this case from Cline v. Wiedimen

holding that "§ 1983 plaintiffs must clearly notify defendants of the potential for individual liability" and "clarify[ing] that reviewing the course of proceedings is the most appropriate way to determine whether such notice has been given"

Summary of this case from Morris v. Bethard

reiterating that § 1983 plaintiffs must clearly notify any defendants of their intent to seek individual liability

Summary of this case from Curran v. Fronabarger

noting that the Fifth Circuit "has repeatedly and emphatically stated that anti-discrimination laws `are not vehicles for judicial second-guessing of business decisions'"

Summary of this case from Jones v. Sears, Roebuck Company
Case details for

Certiorari Denied

Case Details

Full title:CERTIORARI DENIED

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jun 17, 2002

Citations

536 U.S. 922 (2002)

Citing Cases

Mathirampuzha v. Potter

We note that we have previously assumed without analysis that Congress extended Title VN's prohibition on…

Williams v. Gonzales

The Fifth Circuit has held that "the familiar McDonnell Douglas burden-shifting framework applies in Title…