From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
May 14, 2001
532 U.S. 1020 (2001)

Summary

identifying the inconsistency in the majority's analysis, and explicitly basing his concurrence on FRE 801(d)(D)

Summary of this case from Palmer v. Pioneer Inn Associates, Ltd.

Opinion

MAY 14, 2001


No. 00-1386. CLIFFS ON THE BAY CONDOMINIUM ASSN. v. SMITH ET UX. Sup.Ct. Mich. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 463 Mich. 420, 617 N.W.2d 536.

No. 00-1398. JIMENEZ v. HIALEAH HOUSING AUTHORITY. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 00-1402. INTERNATIONAL FIDELITY INSURANCE CO., INC. v. DRILL SOUTH, INC. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 234 F.3d 1232.

No. 00-1404. GRANT, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS A MEMBER OF THE CITY OF LYNCHBURG ELECTORAL BOARD, ET AL. v. SALES, ET AL. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 224 F.3d 293.

No. 00-1405. BARNES v. BARNES. Ct. Sp. App. Md. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 133 Md. App. 700.

No. 00-1411. WILSON, INDIVIDUALLY AND THROUGH HIS GUARDIAN AD LITEM, DUNMORE v. WASHINGTON ET AL. Sup.Ct. Wash. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 142 Wn.2d 40, 10 P.3d 1061.

No. 00-1414. SCHAEFER v. DENISON, DIRECTOR, NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES and PUBLIC SAFETY. Sup.Ct. Nev. Certiorari denied.

No. 00-1418. BARRINGER v. INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. I-89 OF OKLAHOMA COUNTY, OKLAHOMA BOARD OF EDUCATION. C.A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 230 F.3d 1201.

No. 00-1419. SIENKIEWICZ v. HART ET AL. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 00-1421. PHELAN v. LARAMIE COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT BOARD OF TRUSTEES ET AL. C.A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 235 F.3d 1243.

No. 00-1424. EVANS v. YARBROUGH, JUDGE, COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF OHIO, FRANKLIN COUNTY, ET AL. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 238 F.3d 420.

No. 00-1427. WEST VIRGINIA EX REL. WINCHESTER MEDICAL CENTER v. SANDERS, JUDGE, CIRCUIT COURT OF BERKELEY COUNTY, ET AL. Sup.Ct. App. W. Va. Certiorari denied.


Summaries of

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
May 14, 2001
532 U.S. 1020 (2001)

identifying the inconsistency in the majority's analysis, and explicitly basing his concurrence on FRE 801(d)(D)

Summary of this case from Palmer v. Pioneer Inn Associates, Ltd.

stating reimbursement is not limited to the recovery allocated specifically to medical expenses

Summary of this case from Bear v. North Dakota D.H.S
Case details for

Certiorari Denied

Case Details

Full title:CERTIORARI DENIED

Court:U.S.

Date published: May 14, 2001

Citations

532 U.S. 1020 (2001)

Citing Cases

Palmer v. Pioneer Inn Associates, Ltd.

According to the evidence rule, an employee's statement is not hearsay, and thus is freely admissible against…

Peters v. D.S.S.

In his concurrence, Judge Heaney answers the question that the majority did not. He expresses his opinion, in…