From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Jun 23, 2003
539 U.S. 944 (2003)

Summary

finding intervention necessary "only if the government wishes to proceed with the action" and "[e]nding the case by dismissing it is not proceeding with the action"

Summary of this case from United States v. EMD Serono, Inc.

Opinion

JUNE 23, 2003.


No. 02-1682. YEAGLE DRYWALL CO., INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE. C.A.3d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 54 Fed. Appx. 100.

No. 02-1664. BECHHOEFER v. DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION. C.A.2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 312 F.3d 563.

No. 02-1669. SWIFT v. UNITED STATES. C.A.D.C. Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 318 F.3d 250.

No. 02-1706. SWAN v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 52 Fed. Appx. 886.

No. 02-8550. MURPHY v. REINHARD, COMMISSIONER, VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH, MENTAL RETARDATION AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE SERVICES. Sup.Ct. Va. Certiorari denied.

No. 02-9745. DORSEY v. TEXAS. Ct. Crim. App. Tex. Certiorari denied.

No. 02-9792. WILLIAMS v. MISSOURI. Sup.Ct. Mo. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 97 S.W.3d 462.

No. 02-10107. HUTCHISON v. BELL, WARDEN. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 303 F.3d 720.

No. 02-10160. MENOTTI v. ILLINOIS. App. Ct. Ill. 1st Dist. Certiorari denied. Reported below: ___ Ill. App.3d ___, ___ N.E.2d ___.

No. 02-10161. NICKENS v. PEARSON, WARDEN, ET AL. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 46 Fed. Appx. 730.

No. 02-10165. CHALFANT v. TEXAS. Ct. App. Tex., 2d Dist. Certiorari denied.

No. 02-10167. BARBER v. HURLEY, WARDEN. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 02-10169. TYNER v. SIZER, WARDEN, ET AL. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 54 Fed. Appx. 145.

No. 02-10170. WILLIAMS v. NORRIS, DIRECTOR, ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION. C.A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.


Summaries of

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Jun 23, 2003
539 U.S. 944 (2003)

finding intervention necessary "only if the government wishes to proceed with the action" and "[e]nding the case by dismissing it is not proceeding with the action"

Summary of this case from United States v. EMD Serono, Inc.
Case details for

Certiorari Denied

Case Details

Full title:CERTIORARI DENIED

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jun 23, 2003

Citations

539 U.S. 944 (2003)
123 S. Ct. 2622

Citing Cases

Ridenour v. Kaiser Hill Co., L.L.C

Ending the case by dismissing it is not proceeding with the action; to "proceed with the action" means, in…

Wright v. Jamrog

Under these circumstances, Hudgins' comments to the arresting officer did not violate Petitioner's rights…