From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Oct 2, 2000
531 U.S. 880 (2000)

Summary

finding that Hopper held that not every regulatory violation is a "knowingly false statement" and distinguishing this holding from a materiality requirement

Summary of this case from Mikes v. Straus

Opinion

OCTOBER 2, 2000


00-225 MACK v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE CO. C.A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 210 F.3d 375.

00-227 MORGAN v. GOBER, ACTING SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS. C.A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 217 F.3d 858.

00-230 HOLMAN ET UX. v. INDIANA ET AL. C.A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 211 F.3d 399.

00-233 FRAZIER v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 215 F.3d 1326.

00-236 BLAIR ET AL. v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 214 F.3d 690.

00-237 ARMSTRONG ET UX. v. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 211 F.3d 131.

00-245 CORREDOR v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES. Dist.Ct.App. Fla., 5th Dist. Certiorari denied.

00-247 TAMBERELLA v. NEVADA EMPLOYMENT SECURITY DIVISION ET AL. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 210 F.3d 385.

00-253 MARTINEZ v. CALIFORNIA. Sup.Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 22 Cal.4th 750, 996 P.2d 32.

00-282 UNITED STATES EX REL. CANTEKIN v. UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH, ET AL. C.A.3d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 192 F.3d 402.

00-286 MEYER v. UNITED STATES. C.A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 232 F.3d 910.

00-288 SMITH v. HOLTZ ET AL. C.A.3d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 210 F.3d 186.

00-303 OCANA v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 204 F.3d 585.

00-5005 MANNING v. ROE ET AL. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 213 F.3d 642.


Summaries of

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Oct 2, 2000
531 U.S. 880 (2000)

finding that Hopper held that not every regulatory violation is a "knowingly false statement" and distinguishing this holding from a materiality requirement

Summary of this case from Mikes v. Straus

recognizing applicability of the "basic principle of tort law that once a defendant sets in motion a tort, the defendant is generally liable for the damages ultimately caused, unless there are intervening causes" in assessing damages under the FCA

Summary of this case from U.S. ex Rel. Drescher v. Highmark, Inc.
Case details for

Certiorari Denied

Case Details

Full title:CERTIORARI DENIED

Court:U.S.

Date published: Oct 2, 2000

Citations

531 U.S. 880 (2000)
121 S. Ct. 191

Citing Cases

Wolters v. Flagstar Bank FSB

Mack did not dispute or object to this statement, and accordingly admitted it as true.”), cert. denied, 531…

Wolters v. Flagstar Bank FSB

See Mack v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., No. 99-2315, 210 F.3d 375, 2000 WL 52888, *5 (7th Cir. Jan. 21,…