From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Dec 11, 2000
531 U.S. 1053 (2000)

Opinion

DECEMBER 11, 2000


00-741 ABELLO-SILVA v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.

00-762 METCALF v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 221 F.3d 1336.

00-778 SCISSELL v. SAN DIEGO COUNTY. Ct. App. Cal., 4th App. Dist. Certiorari denied.

00-790 BRICKNER v. VOINOVICH, GOVERNOR OF OHIO, ET AL. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 221 F.3d 1333.

00-5073 DIAZ-FABIAN v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 213 F.3d 635.

00-5215 WILSON v. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 213 F.3d 638.

00-5274 LOGAN v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 210 F.3d 820.

00-5790 GUNDERSON v. HETTGAR, WARDEN, ET AL. C.A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 201 F.3d 447.

00-5815 ROMERO-TAMAYO v. UNITED STATES. C.A.2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 212 F.3d 729.

00-6037 SANTIAGO v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 220 F.3d 591.

00-6061 FORTUNE v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 216 F.3d 1088.

00-6389 SPIVEY v. HEAD, WARDEN. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 207 F.3d 1263.

00-6457 ATKINS v. BOONE, WARDEN. C.A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 211 F.3d 1277.

00-6458 DE SPENZA v. CAMBRA, WARDEN, ET AL. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

00-6467 ANDERSON v. VIRGINIA. Sup.Ct. Va. Certiorari denied.

00-6476 LLOYD v. MOORE, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.


Summaries of

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Dec 11, 2000
531 U.S. 1053 (2000)
Case details for

Certiorari Denied

Case Details

Full title:CERTIORARI DENIED

Court:U.S.

Date published: Dec 11, 2000

Citations

531 U.S. 1053 (2000)

Citing Cases

Freeman v. Dunn

A jury's consideration of the appropriateness of retribution is also proper. Spivey v. Hand, 207 F.3d 1263,…

U.S. v. PRUE

Yet even if Peneaux's statement is facially incriminating, Prue has nonetheless failed to show that whatever…