From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Oct 10, 2000
531 U.S. 927 (2000)

Summary

holding that mandatory overtime work was an essential function of employee's job as utility lineman

Summary of this case from Zaborowski v. Sealright Co., Inc.

Opinion

OCTOBER 10, 2000


00-168 CHEMICAL ALLIED PRODUCT WORKERS UNION, LOCAL 20, AFL-CIO v. JAYS FOODS, L.L.C. C.A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 208 F.3d 610.

00-169 DAVIS v. FLORIDA POWER LIGHT CO. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 205 F.3d 1301.

00-171 LAWRENCE v. CURATORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI. C.A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 204 F.3d 807.

00-173 LaFLAMME v. ESSEX JUNCTION SCHOOL DISTRICT. Sup.Ct. Vt. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 170 Vt. 475, 750 A.2d 993.

00-176 APEL ET AL. v. CANARY. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 211 F.3d 324.

00-179 SOUTHEASTERN FERTILITY CENTER v. AETNA CASUALTY SURETY CO. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 205 F.3d 1334.

00-181 WOOD v. PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA ET AL. C.A.3d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 207 F.3d 674.

00-190 FLICK v. LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE CO. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 205 F.3d 386.

00-205 JOHNSON, COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE OF TENNESSEE v. J. C. PENNEY NATIONAL BANK. Ct. App. Tenn. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 19 S.W.3d 831.

00-207 WASSON v. SONOMA COUNTY JUNIOR COLLEGE DISTRICT ET AL. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 203 F.3d 659.

00-208 DeGENNARO v. FURR. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 203 F.3d 840.

00-210 BERG v. STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA. Sup.Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied.

00-212 SCHMITT INDUSTRIES, INC. v. BALANCE DYNAMICS CORP. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 204 F.3d 683.


Summaries of

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Oct 10, 2000
531 U.S. 927 (2000)

holding that mandatory overtime work was an essential function of employee's job as utility lineman

Summary of this case from Zaborowski v. Sealright Co., Inc.

finding that the power to dispense with the proof of loss requirement is exclusively FEMA's, and courts may not read the regulations leniently

Summary of this case from Smith-Pierre v. Fidelity National Indemnity Ins. Co.

recognizing damage control costs and harm to goodwill as damages

Summary of this case from Windstream Holdings v. Charter Commc'ns Inc. (In re Windstream Holdings)

stating that, while it was not court's purpose "to decide whether 'physical presence' is required under the Commerce Clause," lack of substantial nexus did not justify assessment of franchise and excise taxes on out-of-State credit card company

Summary of this case from Capital One Bank v. Commissioner of Revenue
Case details for

Certiorari Denied

Case Details

Full title:CERTIORARI DENIED

Court:U.S.

Date published: Oct 10, 2000

Citations

531 U.S. 927 (2000)
121 S. Ct. 305

Citing Cases

Ortiz v. De San Juan

In turn, as pointed out by several circuits, "the absence of speech—in fact, its explicit disclaimer by…

Zaborowski v. Sealright Co., Inc.

Where the demands of the job require working overtime on a regular basis, other courts have held that…