Summary
recognizing that the amended complaint was the legally operative complaint
Summary of this case from Smith v. GradyOpinion
JUNE 29, 2001
No. 00-1648. TURNER ET UX. v. CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS ET AL. Ct. App. Tex., 5th Dist. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 18 S.W.3d 877.
No. 00-1655. PARRY v. MOHAWK MOTORS OF MICHIGAN, INC., ET AL. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 236 F.3d 299.
No. 00-1660. SEYMOUR ET AL. v. CONNECTICUT ELECTIONS ENFORCEMENT COMMISSION. Sup.Ct. Conn. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 225 Conn. 78, 762 A.2d 880.
No. 00-1667. GREEN, ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF GREEN v. MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER SMITH INC. ET AL. App. Ct. Ill., 1st Dist. Certiorari denied.
No. 00-1670. CAMOSCIO v. DEMINICO. C.A . 1st Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 248 F.3d 1126.
No. 00-1673. WANG v. NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE. C.A.2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 216 F.3d 1074.
No. 00-1686. ROST v. CITY OF HENDERSON. Sup.Ct. Nev. Certiorari denied.
No. 00-1690. STURGEON v. BENTON ET AL. C.A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 242 F.3d 376.
No. 00-1694. CAMOSCIO v. MASSACHUSETTS. Sup. Jud. Ct. Mass. Certiorari denied.
No. 00-1701. BODELL, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF BODELL, AN INFANT v. CUNNINGHAM ET AL. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 248 F.3d 1146.
No. 00-1713. TORRES GONZALES v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 240 F.3d 14.
No. 00-1730. FRASER v. NEW YORK. Ct. App. N.Y. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 96 N.Y.2d 318, 752 N.E.2d 244.
No. 00-1731. DIERKING v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF ARIZONA ET AL. Ct. App. Ariz. Certiorari denied.