From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Nov 27, 2000
531 U.S. 1015 (2000)

Opinion

NOVEMBER 27, 2000


00-663 GOLDIN INDUSTRIES, INC., ET AL. v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 219 F.3d 1271.

00-664 ESTATE OF HENDERSON ET AL. v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA ET AL. C.A.3d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 216 F.3d 1076.

00-667 GOAD v. UNITED STATES. C.A. Fed Cir. Certiorari denied.

00-673 SANDERS ET VIR v. UNITED STATES. C.A.2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 211 F.3d 711.

00-682 WALKER v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 213 F.3d 409.

00-685 LIDDANE ET AL. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE. C.A.3d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 208 F.3d 206.

00-690 McCLATCHEY v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 217 F.3d 823.

00-5048 ABRAMS v. GAMMON, SUPERINTENDENT, MOBERLY CORRECTIONAL CENTER. C.A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.

00-5115 REID v. UNITED STATES. Ct. App.D.C. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 721 A.2d 945.

00-5120 MORTON v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE. C.A. Fed Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 232 F.3d 911.

00-5316 LOGAN v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.

00-5380 WASHINGTON v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 197 F.3d 1214.

00-5608 DAVIDIAN v. O'MARA ET AL. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 210 F.3d 371.

00-5615 RAY v. HOUSTON COMMUNITY COLLEGE. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

00-5677 WARD v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


Summaries of

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Nov 27, 2000
531 U.S. 1015 (2000)
Case details for

Certiorari Denied

Case Details

Full title:CERTIORARI DENIED

Court:U.S.

Date published: Nov 27, 2000

Citations

531 U.S. 1015 (2000)

Citing Cases

Smith v. Diffee Ford-Lincoln-Mercury, Inc.

"We review the district court's decision to give a particular jury instruction for abuse of discretion and…

Williams v. N.Y. State Gaming Comm'n

Motions to compel are “entrusted to the sound discretion of the district court.” In re Fitch, Inc., 330 F.3d…