Summary
noting thatHouston was based on interpretation of federal statutes and procedural rules, not constitutional principles, and therefore state courts are not bound by the decision
Summary of this case from Spatgen v. R.J. Reynolds, Inc.Opinion
FEBRUARY 26, 2001
00-7660. TAYLOR v. MICHIGAN. Ct. App. Mich. Certiorari denied.
00-7662. SONTAG v. MECHLING, SUPERINTENDENT, STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION AT WAYNESBURG. C.A.3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
00-7668. RODRIGUEZ v. WILLIAMS, WARDEN, ET AL. C.A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
00-7664. UNDERWOOD v. CALDERON, WARDEN. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 230 F.3d 1368.
00-7665. WHITE v. SMITH, WARDEN. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
00-7668. SUTTON v. ILLINOIS. App. Ct. III., 1st Dist. Certiorari denied.
00-7670. WILLIS v. WILLIAMS, WARDEN, ET AL. C.A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
00-7671. WEBB v. WILLLAMS, WARDEN, ET AL. C.A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
00-7673. TWYMAN v. KING COUNTY; WASHINGTON, ET AL. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
00-7675. THOMPSON v. OKANAGAN HOUSE, INC., ET AL. Ct. App. Wash. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 100 Wn. App. 1002.
00-7681. STONE v. TEXAS. Ct. Crim. App. Tex. Certiorari denied.
00-7684. ADAMS v. LeMASTER, WARDEN, ET AL. C.A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 223 F.3d 1177.
00-7686. JACKSON v. HARGETT, WARDEN. C.A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 221 F.3d 1352.
00-7687. SIMS v. ILLINOIS. Sup.Ct. Ill. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 192 Ill.2d 592, 736 N.E.2d 1048.
00-7691. CODDINGTON v. CALIFORNIA. Sup.Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 23 Cal.4th 529, 2 P.3d 1081.