From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
May 20, 2002
535 U.S. 1087 (2002)

Summary

clarifying that duties of counsel when preparing Anders brief are to satisfy court that counsel has thoroughly examined record in search of appealable issues and explain why issues are frivolous

Summary of this case from Com. v. Santiago

Opinion

MAY 20, 2002.


No. 01-9656 YOULA, AKA FOFANA v. UNITED STATES. C.A.3d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 29 Fed. Appx. 70.

No. 01-9658 GONZALEZ LORA v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 26 Fed. Appx. 149.

No. 01-9660 JACKSON v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 01-9662 MATTHEWS v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 278 F.3d 560.

No. 01-9666 NICHOLSON v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 01-9667 PARKS v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 30 Fed. Appx. 534.

No. 01-9669 PIRTLE v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 23 Fed. Appx. 790.

No. 01-9673 ROBERTS v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 272 F.3d 1069.

No. 01-9677 SCRUGGS v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 276 F.3d 211.

No. 01-9682 ASHTON v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 22 Fed. Appx. 190.

No. 01-9683 BIBBS v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 23 Fed. Appx. 502.

No. 01-9684 McCARTHY v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 18 Fed. Appx. 81.

No. 01-9689 GIORGIES v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 29 Fed. Appx. 472.

No. 01-9690 HUTCHERSON v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 31 Fed. Appx. 934.

No. 01-9695 WESTBROOK v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 281 F.3d 1283.

No. 01-9699 WALKER v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 270 F.3d 413.


Summaries of

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
May 20, 2002
535 U.S. 1087 (2002)

clarifying that duties of counsel when preparing Anders brief are to satisfy court that counsel has thoroughly examined record in search of appealable issues and explain why issues are frivolous

Summary of this case from Com. v. Santiago
Case details for

Certiorari Denied

Case Details

Full title:CERTIORARI DENIED

Court:U.S.

Date published: May 20, 2002

Citations

535 U.S. 1087 (2002)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Mcmurray

The court also stated that “[i]t has already been established that the crime of aggravated assault has as an…

U.S. v. Kamerud

The Kameruds raise numerous other pre-trial, trial, and sentencing issues, all of which we review for plain…