From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Oct 29, 2001
534 U.S. 1001 (2001)

Summary

holding that "statutory damages under § 2520(c)(B) should depend only on the number of days on which the Act was violated, rather than on whether the act was violated by a prohibited interception, disclosure, or intentional use. A particular defendant's liability under § 2520(c)(B) should not turn on the consistency or variety of his violations"

Summary of this case from Directv, Inc. v. Griffin

Opinion

OCTOBER 29, 2001


No. 01-6026 JEFFERS v. CHANDLER, WARDEN. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 253 F.3d 827.

No. 01-6027 JEMMERISON v. COCKRELL, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 01-6030 JONES v. COCKRELL, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 01-6037 WELLONS v. TURPIN, WARDEN. Sup.Ct. Ga. Certiorari denied.

No. 01-6040 SMOOT v. UNITED TRANSPORTATION UNION ET AL. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 246 F.3d 633.

No. 01-6043 WARE v. CALIFORNIA BOARD OF PRISON TERMS AND PAROLES ET AL. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 230 F.3d 1368.

No. 01-6044 WILSON v. MASSANARI, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY. C.A.2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 6 Fed. Appx. 94.

No. 01-6048 BROWN v. CAIN, WARDEN. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 01-6049 RUDD v. COCKRELL, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 256 F.3d 317.

No. 01-6050 MITCHELL v. HOUSTON HOUSING URBAN DEVELOPMENT ET AL. Ct. App. Tex., 14th Dist. Certiorari denied.

No. 01-6051 SCHIEBLE v. SOUTH CAROLINA ET AL. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 7 Fed. Appx. 247.

No. 01-6052 WILSON v. KELLER. Ct. App. Ga. Certiorari denied.

No. 01-6056 WILLIAMS v. ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS ET AL. C.A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 01-6057 THOMASON v. THOMASON. Sup.Ct. Wash. Certiorari denied.


Summaries of

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Oct 29, 2001
534 U.S. 1001 (2001)

holding that "statutory damages under § 2520(c)(B) should depend only on the number of days on which the Act was violated, rather than on whether the act was violated by a prohibited interception, disclosure, or intentional use. A particular defendant's liability under § 2520(c)(B) should not turn on the consistency or variety of his violations"

Summary of this case from Directv, Inc. v. Griffin

holding that "statutory damages under § 2520(c)(B) should depend only on the number of days on which the Act was violated, rather than on whether the act was violated by a prohibited interception, disclosure, or intentional use. A particular defendant's liability under § 2520(c)(B) should not turn on the consistency or variety of his violations"

Summary of this case from Directv, Inc. v. Griffin.

recognizing that an attack on a state habeas corpus proceeding is an attack on a proceeding collateral to the petitioner's detention and not on the validity of the detention itself

Summary of this case from SOSA v. DRETKE
Case details for

Certiorari Denied

Case Details

Full title:CERTIORARI DENIED

Court:U.S.

Date published: Oct 29, 2001

Citations

534 U.S. 1001 (2001)

Citing Cases

SOSA v. DRETKE

The AEDPA significantly restricts the scope of federal habeas review of state court fact findings, requiring…

Bagwell v. Cockrell

SeeFoster v. Johnson, 293 F.3d 766, 776 (5th Cir. 2002), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 123 S.Ct. 625, 154…