From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Nov 13, 2001
534 U.S. 1021 (2001)

Summary

stating that "because the SEC lacks the resources to police the entire securities industry, it relies on participants in the markets to govern themselves"

Summary of this case from U.S.S.E.C. v. Vittor

Opinion

NOVEMBER 13, 2001


No. 01-436 LINDAMOOD v. OFFICE OF THE STATE ATTORNEY. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 253 F.3d 711.

No. 01-439 BUTTS v. TEXAS. Ct. App. Tex., 7th Dist. Certiorari denied.

No. 01-444 BETTERSWORTH v. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION ET AL. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 248 F.3d 386.

No. 01-450 BROWN v. TEXAS. Ct. App. Tex., 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 01-453 NAVROZOV v. NOVOYE RUSSKOYE SLOVO PUBLISHING CORP. ET AL. App. Div., Sup.Ct. N.Y. 1st Jud. Dept. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 280 A.D.2d 426, 721 N.Y.S.2d 501.

No. 01-458 STARLIGHT SUGAR, INC., ET AL v. SOTO, SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE OF PUERTO RICO. C.A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 253 F.3d 137.

No. 01-462 WAITE v. PATCH PRODUCTS, INC., ET AL. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 12 Fed. Appx. 330.

No. 01-464 LINER v. DONTRON, INC., T/A RADIO STATION WYCA-FM, ET AL. C.A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 9 Fed. Appx. 523.

No. 01-465 OTTO v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. C.A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 253 F.3d 960.

No. 01-473 ADAMS v. FRANKLIN, SHERIFF, ET AL. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 01-474 TIMMONS ET AL. v. CASSELL ET AL. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 13 Fed. Appx. 298.

No. 01-476 JACOBS ET AL. v. WU ET AL. C.A. D.C. Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 01-479 MARTIN ET AL. v. PENNSYLVANIA; and MARTIN v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF LAW EXAMINERS. Super. Ct. Pa. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 766 A.2d 896 (first judgment).


Summaries of

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Nov 13, 2001
534 U.S. 1021 (2001)

stating that "because the SEC lacks the resources to police the entire securities industry, it relies on participants in the markets to govern themselves"

Summary of this case from U.S.S.E.C. v. Vittor
Case details for

Certiorari Denied

Case Details

Full title:CERTIORARI DENIED

Court:U.S.

Date published: Nov 13, 2001

Citations

534 U.S. 1021 (2001)

Citing Cases

U.S.S.E.C. v. Vittor

Section 21(f) limits only original SEC actions to enforce compliance with SRO rules. The limitation in…

U.S. v. Angelos

379 F.3d 1208 (10th Cir. 2004).Id. at 1217 (quoting Starlight Sugar, Inc. v. Soto, 253 F.3d 137, 146 (1st…