From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Oct 30, 2000
531 U.S. 957 (2000)

Summary

holding that Rule 8 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Court vests district courts with discretion to conduct an evidentiary hearing, so long as it is not barred by § 2254(e)

Summary of this case from Guidry v. Dretke

Opinion

OCTOBER 30, 2000


99-10145 DYE v. INDIANA. Sup.Ct. Ind. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 717 N.E.2d 5.

99-10198 IRULA v. RENO, ATTORNEY GENERAL. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

99-10268 MURPHY v. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 205 F.3d 809.

00-31 CHEVY CHASE LAND COMPANY OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND v. UNITED STATES ET AL. C.A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 230 F.3d 1375.

00-101 STRAND ET AL. v. VERIZON NORTH INC., ET AL. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 209 F.3d 909.

00-160 BRAZOS ELECTRIC POWER COOPERATIVE v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION ET AL. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 205 F.3d 235.

00-180 BURILOVICH ET UX., AS NEXT FRIENDS ON BEHALF OF THEIR SON BURILOVICH v. BOARD OF EDUCATION THE LINCOLN CONSOLIDATED SCHOOLS ET AL. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 208 F.3d 560.

00-185 TORRENCE, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS LEGAL GUARDIAN FOR THE USE AND BENEFIT OF MINOR DAUGHTER, TORRENCE, AND AS ADMINISTRATRIX AT LAW OF THE ESTATE OF DECEASED HUSBAND, TORRENCE, ET AL v. ORYX ENERGY CO. ET AL. C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 214 F.3d 1350.

00-187 DORAN v. CARNIVAL CORP. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 214 F.3d 1350.

00-238 TREECE v. HOCHSTETLER ET AL. C.A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 213 F.3d 360.

00-246 COHEN v. OFFICE DEPOT, INC. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 204 F.3d 1069.

00-278 CHANG v. FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK. App. Div., Sup.Ct. N.Y., 2d Jud. Dept. Certiorari denied.


Summaries of

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Oct 30, 2000
531 U.S. 957 (2000)

holding that Rule 8 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Court vests district courts with discretion to conduct an evidentiary hearing, so long as it is not barred by § 2254(e)

Summary of this case from Guidry v. Dretke

discussing a previous decision conflicting with a more recent case and stating "where two prior panel decisions conflict we are bound to follow the oldest one." quoting United States v. Steele, 147 F.3d 1316, 1318 (11th Cir. 1998) (en banc)

Summary of this case from Freeman v. Astrue
Case details for

Certiorari Denied

Case Details

Full title:CERTIORARI DENIED

Court:U.S.

Date published: Oct 30, 2000

Citations

531 U.S. 957 (2000)

Citing Cases

SOSA v. DRETKE

This non-retroactivity doctrine applies equally to a novel application of an old rule.SeeCasparl v. Bohlen,…

Salazar v. Dretke

Federal courts are generally barred from applying new constitutional rules of criminal procedure…