From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Mar 26, 2001
532 U.S. 945 (2001)

Opinion

MARCH 26, 2001


No. 00-8048. JOHNSON v. GIBSON, WARDEN, ET AL. C.A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 229 F.3d 1163.

No. 00-8049. ZENTHOFER v. ANDERSON, SUPERINTENDENT, INDIANA STATE PRISON. C.A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 00-8055. DESMOND v. SNYDER ET AL. C.A.3d Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 00-8057. PELLEGRINO v. FITZGERALD ET AL. C.A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 221 F.3d 1343.

No. 00-8059. BROUSSARD v. ROE, WARDEN, ET AL. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 00-8065. CHURCHWELL v. OKLAHOMA. Ct. Crim. App. Okla. Certiorari denied.

No. 00-8067. DAVIES v. INDIANA. Ct. App. Ind. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 730 N.E.2d 726.

No. 00-8068. CASPER v. GUNITE CORP. C.A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 221 F.3d 1338.

No. 00-8075. RAMIREZ v. TEXAS. Ct. App. Tex., 2d Dist. Certiorari denied.

No. 00-8080. BANCROFT v. CAIN, WARDEN. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 234 F.3d 30.

No. 00-8091. GARCIA ESPINOZA v. RUIZ ET UX. Ct. App. Tex., 14th Dist. Certiorari denied.

No. 00-8096. CARLSON v. BUSH, GOVERNOR OF FLORIDA. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 233 F.3d 578.

No. 00-8104. KEARSE v. FLORIDA. Sup.Ct. Fla. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 770 So.2d 1119.

No. 00-8106. JEFFERSON v. ROCKETT ET AL. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 244 F.3d 136.

No. 00-8111. BLOUNT v. MOORE, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 00-8113. POSADA v. NEAL, WARDEN. C.A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 234 F.3d 1273.


Summaries of

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Mar 26, 2001
532 U.S. 945 (2001)
Case details for

Certiorari Denied

Case Details

Full title:CERTIORARI DENIED

Court:U.S.

Date published: Mar 26, 2001

Citations

532 U.S. 945 (2001)

Citing Cases

Walters v. State

ure and therefore warranted mandamus relief. Similarly, in Stout v. State, 795 So.2d 227 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001),…

Taylor v. State

The court must find that the error did not contribute to the verdict, that is, that the error was unimportant…