From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Feb 20, 2001
531 U.S. 1165 (2001)

Summary

holding that "because [a co-defendant's] confession was fully redacted and did not incriminate defendant, its admission into evidence did not violate defendant's rights under the Confrontation Clause"

Summary of this case from State v. Barnes

Opinion

FEBRUARY 20, 2001


00-7467. POYSON v. ARIZONA. Sup.Ct. Ariz. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 198 Ariz. 70, 7 P.3d 79.

00-7469. SMITH v. ANGELONE, DIRECTOR, VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 208 F.3d 210.

00-7470. SWEED v. COUNTY OF EL PASO ET AL. Ct. App. Tex., 8th Dist. Certiorari denied.

00-7473. NAVARRO v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT; and

00-7474. PAJE v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT. C.A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 243 F.3d 554.

00-7475. BREWINGTON v. NORTH CAROLINA. Sup.Ct. N.C. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 352 N.C. 489, 532 S.E.2d 496.

00-7477. OKEN v. CORCORAN, WARDEN, ET AL. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 220 F.3d 259.

00-7478. KASSAB v. SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY Ct. App. Cal., 4th App. Dist. Certiorari denied.

00-7479. COFER v. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 226 F.3d 643.

00-7481. CRABTREE v. FIGUEROA, WARDEN. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 229 F.3d 1151.

00-7482. CARROLL v. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

00-7484. TIFFER v. WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD ET AL. Sup.Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied.

00-7486. GIANO v. PATAKI, GOVERNOR OF NEW YORK. C.A.2d Cir. Certiorari denied.

00-7487. BRITT v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 234 F.3d 1274.


Summaries of

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Feb 20, 2001
531 U.S. 1165 (2001)

holding that "because [a co-defendant's] confession was fully redacted and did not incriminate defendant, its admission into evidence did not violate defendant's rights under the Confrontation Clause"

Summary of this case from State v. Barnes

holding that "because [a co-defendant's] confession was fully redacted and did not incriminate defendant, its admission into evidence did not violate defendant's rights under the Confrontation Clause"

Summary of this case from State v. Barnes

holding that polygraph results, which are subjective and unreliable, do not fall within the scope of statute providing for discovery of results or reports of tests, measurements or experiments made in connection with the case

Summary of this case from State v. Dunn
Case details for

Certiorari Denied

Case Details

Full title:CERTIORARI DENIED

Court:U.S.

Date published: Feb 20, 2001

Citations

531 U.S. 1165 (2001)

Citing Cases

State v. Hammonds

State v. Jackson , 368 N.C. 75, 78, 772 S.E.2d 847, 849 (2015) (quoting State v. Otto , 366 N.C. 134, 136,…

State v. Wilson

See State v. Brewington, 352 N.C. 489, 503, 532 S.E.2d 496, 504 (2000) (Interrogation includes "`[a]ny words…