From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Apr 16, 2001
532 U.S. 973 (2001)

Opinion

APRIL 16, 2001


No. 00-1344. WHEELER v. THOMAS F. WHITE CO., INC., ET AL. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 229 F.3d 1161.

No. 00-1347. JONAS v. UNISUN INSURANCE CO. ET AL. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 230 F.3d 1352.

No. 00-1355. GANULIN v. UNITED STATES ET AL. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 238 F.3d 420.

No. 00-1357. BUCHBINDER ET UX. v. FRANCHISE TAX BOARD OF CALIFORNIA ET AL. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 242 F.3d 380.

No. 00-1358. DAVIDSON, COLORADO SECRETARY OF STATE v. CAMPBELL ET AL. C.A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 233 F.3d 1229.

No. 00-1364. NATIONAL ORGANZATION OF VETERANS' ADVOCATES, INC. v. PRINCIPI, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS. C.A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 234 F.3d 682.

No. 00-1367. ADBIDEKUN v. NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY. C.A.2d Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 00-1368. BRAZAS v. BRAZAS ET AL. App.Ct. Ill., 2d Dist. Certiorari denied. Reported below: ___ Ill. App.3d ___, ___ N.E.2d ___.

No. 00-1369. BARRETT v. BOROUGH OF CARLISLE. Commw.Ct. Pa. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 758 A.2d 773.

No. 00-1384. BOYNE v. MOORE, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 00-1387. WHITLOCK CORP., FKA APEX AUTOMOTIVE WAREHOUSE, L.P. v. DELOITTE TOUCHE, L.L.P. C.A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 233 F.3d 1063.

No. 00-1389. JAMES v. GENERAL MOTORS CORP. C.A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 230 F.3d 315.


Summaries of

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Apr 16, 2001
532 U.S. 973 (2001)
Case details for

Certiorari Denied

Case Details

Full title:CERTIORARI DENIED

Court:U.S.

Date published: Apr 16, 2001

Citations

532 U.S. 973 (2001)

Citing Cases

Parker v. Kraft Foods Global, Inc.

The Court finds that the Committee "reasonably believed the purpose of the Plan was to provide an `income…

National Organization of Veterans' Advocates, Inc. v. Secretary of Veterans Affairs

"This review is `highly deferential' to the actions of the agency." Disabled Am. Veterans v. Gober, 234 F.3d…