From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Oct 2, 2000
531 U.S. 816 (2000)

Summary

holding that the breadth of a challenged statute indicated that Congress "was aiming not to punish appellants, but rather to regulate an entire class"

Summary of this case from Foretich v. U.S.

Opinion

OCTOBER 2, 2000


99-1859 ROMERO v. LOPEZ ET AL. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 208 F.3d 222.

99-1860 BROWN v. KANSAS. Ct. App. Kan. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 26 Kan. App. 2d ___, 983 P.2d 289.

99-1861 KENDRICK v. ALABAMA. Ct. Crim. App. Ala. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 768 So.2d 1029.

99-1862 KIPPS ET AL. v. CAILLIER ET AL. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 197 F.3d 765.

99-1863 BREAUX ET AL. v. CITY OF GARLAND ET AL. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 205 F.3d 150.

99-1867 GREENE v. HACKETT, GENERAL SESSIONS COURT JUDGE OF SHELBY COUNTY, TENNESSEE, DIVISION II, ET AL. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 202 F.3d 268.

99-1869 WEST v. TEXAS. Ct. App. Tex., 14th Dist. Certiorari denied.

99-1874 NAVEGAR, INC., DBA INTRATEC, ET AL. v. UNITED STATES. C.A.D.C. Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 192 F.3d 1050.

99-1875 ST. ROMAIN ET AL. v. SUPERIOR WELL SERVICE, INC. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 203 F.3d 376.

99-1876 KOTERBA v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, BUREAU OF DRIVER LICENSING. Commw. Ct. Pa. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 736 A.2d 761.

99-1877 LINDA W. ET AL. v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION ET AL. C.A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 200 F.3d 504.

99-1878 STRAND ET AL. v. MICHIGAN BELL TELEPHONE, ET AL. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 202 F.3d 862.

99-1881 KRAMER ET AL. v. PRICE ET AL. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 200 F.3d 1237.

99-1882 GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORP. v. UNITED STATES GYPSUM CO. ET AL. C.A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 195 F.3d 1322 and 204 F.3d 1359.


Summaries of

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Oct 2, 2000
531 U.S. 816 (2000)

holding that the breadth of a challenged statute indicated that Congress "was aiming not to punish appellants, but rather to regulate an entire class"

Summary of this case from Foretich v. U.S.

affirming suspension of driver license based on New Jersey conviction report received electronically that had not been certified by any New Jersey official, but had been certified by the Secretary of DOT and by the Director of the Bureau of Driver Licensing

Summary of this case from Gallant v. Com
Case details for

Certiorari Denied

Case Details

Full title:CERTIORARI DENIED

Court:U.S.

Date published: Oct 2, 2000

Citations

531 U.S. 816 (2000)

Citing Cases

Wallace v. County of Comal

Regarding Schwab, Defendants state Plaintiffs have only alleged one complaint Schwab made. Defendants cite…

U.S. v. Schaffner

As the Supreme Court itself has acknowledged, and our colleagues in the District of Columbia Circuit have…