From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Oct 2, 2000
531 U.S. 819 (2000)

Summary

interpreting "the State" in the definition of "employer" as logically and sensibly to mean any state, not just New Jersey, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 1:1-2, and comparing other state statutes in this regard, such as N.J.S.A. 2A:41A-1 ("[a] State" means "a State of the United States"); N.J.S.A. 2A:159A-2 ("State" means "a State of the United States") and N.J.S.A. 30:7B-2(h) ("State" means "any State . . . of the United States.")

Summary of this case from ROSS FOGG v. DIRECTOR, DIV. OF TAX

Opinion

OCTOBER 2, 2000


99-1925 McKINNEY v. ROBINSON, WARDEN. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.

99-1927 TARGET CORP. v. HOLLISTER ET AL.; and

00-37 HOLLISTER v. TARGET CORP., ET AL. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 201 F.3d 731.

99-1929 MORGAN v. BENNETT, SUPERINTENDENT, ELMIRA CORRECTIONAL FACILITY. C.A.2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 204 F.3d 360.

99-1933 AHRENS v. PEROT SYSTEMS CORP. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 205 F.3d 831.

99-1934 ILLINOIS ET AL. v. McDONNELL. Sup.Ct. N.J. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 205 F.3d 108.

99-1937 AMERICAN MANUFACTURERS MUTUAL INSURANCE CO. v. IRVIN ET AL.; AND

00-36 GAINESVILLE LIVESTOCK MARKET, INC., ET AL. v. AMERICAN MANUFACTURERS MUTUAL INSURANCE CO. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 182 F.3d 1284.

99-1938 MILLIGAN v. NORTH CAROLINA, ET AL. Ct. App. N.C. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 135 N.C. App. 781, 522 S.E.2d 330.

99-1939 FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY v. LUKE AIR FORCE BASE, ARIZONA. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 208 F.3d 221.

99-1940 CARROLL v. CALDERON, WARDEN. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 202 F.3d 277.

99-1942 DUNHAM v. WADLEY ET AL. C.A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 195 F.3d 1007.

99-1943 HACKBARTH v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

99-1944 BLOOM v. JEWISH HOME FOR THE ELDERLY OF FAIRFIELD COUNTY. C.A.2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 205 F.3d 1321.

99-1945 KUHNEL, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHER WORKERS' COMPENSATION LIEN PAYERS SIMILARLY SITUATED v. CNA INSURANCE COS. ET AL. Super. Ct. N.J., App. Div. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 322 N.J. Super. 568, 731 A.2d 564.


Summaries of

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Oct 2, 2000
531 U.S. 819 (2000)

interpreting "the State" in the definition of "employer" as logically and sensibly to mean any state, not just New Jersey, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 1:1-2, and comparing other state statutes in this regard, such as N.J.S.A. 2A:41A-1 ("[a] State" means "a State of the United States"); N.J.S.A. 2A:159A-2 ("State" means "a State of the United States") and N.J.S.A. 30:7B-2(h) ("State" means "any State . . . of the United States.")

Summary of this case from ROSS FOGG v. DIRECTOR, DIV. OF TAX
Case details for

Certiorari Denied

Case Details

Full title:CERTIORARI DENIED

Court:U.S.

Date published: Oct 2, 2000

Citations

531 U.S. 819 (2000)

Citing Cases

Jamison v. Berbary

The Second Circuit has long held, and the Supreme Court confirmed, that "a state prisoner must present his…

Wilson v. Bennett

He also exhausted his remedies in state court by raising the same issue in his letter seeking leave to appeal…