From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Mar 4, 2002
535 U.S. 907 (2002)

Summary

holding that the trial court's statement in its sentencing order that Ferguson was not `insane' did not show that the trial court applied the standard of insanity to Ferguson's proffered evidence of mitigation

Summary of this case from Dotch v. State

Opinion

MARCH 4, 2002.


No. 01-7464 FERGUSON v. ALABAMA. Sup.Ct. Ala. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 814 So.2d 970.

No. 01-7484 WARD v. ALABAMA. Ct. Crim. App. Ala. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 814 So.2d 899.

No. 01-7486 REYES v. GARCIA, WARDEN. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 19 Fed. Appx. 631.

No. 01-7491 BULLARD v. BARKER, SUPERINTENDENT, SAMPSON COUNTY PRISON UNIT, ET AL. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 13 Fed. Appx. 134.

No. 01-7500 TIDIK v. WAYNE COUNTY FRIEND OF THE COURT, ET AL. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 01-7508 SHELBY v. WITHROW, WARDEN. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 27 Fed. Appx. 273.

No. 01-7510 ROGERS v. COCKRELL, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 01-7511 HARRIS v. CALIFORNIA. Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist. Certiorari denied.

No. 01-7512 FOSTER v. STRAUB, WARDEN. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 22 Fed. Appx. 403.

No. 01-7514 FLYNN v. THOMAS ET AL. App. Ct. Ill., 1st Dist. Certiorari denied. Reported below: ___ Ill. App.3d ___, ___ N.E.2d ___.

No. 01-7515 HARRIS v. COLORADO. Ct. App. Colo. Certiorari denied.

No. 01-7516 WILLIAMS v. PRUNTY, WARDEN, ET AL. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 10 Fed. Appx. 499.

No. 01-7518 AZIZ v. TRI-STATE UNIVERSITY. C.A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 01-7523 TWEH v. NEW JERSEY. Super St. N.J., App. Div. Certiorari denied.

No. 01-7528 DUMONT v. UBC, INC. App. Ct. Conn. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 64 Conn. App. 903, 707 A.2d 213.


Summaries of

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Mar 4, 2002
535 U.S. 907 (2002)

holding that the trial court's statement in its sentencing order that Ferguson was not `insane' did not show that the trial court applied the standard of insanity to Ferguson's proffered evidence of mitigation

Summary of this case from Dotch v. State

holding that prosecutor can draw inferences and deductions from the evidence although Ferguson argued that prosecutor improperly "`offered advice on how to evaluate Ferguson's statements to police, which contradicted the testimony of his codefendant on the • question of [Ferguson's] role in the shootings"'

Summary of this case from Morris v. State

holding that the trial court's statement in its sentencing order that Ferguson was not "insane" did not show that the trial court applied the standard of insanity to Ferguson's proffered evidence of mitigation

Summary of this case from Lewis v. State
Case details for

Certiorari Denied

Case Details

Full title:CERTIORARI DENIED

Court:U.S.

Date published: Mar 4, 2002

Citations

535 U.S. 907 (2002)

Citing Cases

Whatley v. State

Id.”Ferguson v. State, 814 So.2d 925, 945–46 (Ala.Crim.App.2000), affirmed, 814 So.2d 970 (Ala.2001), cert.…

Phillips v. State

" ‘While the failure to object will not bar our review of [Phillips's] claims of prosecutorial misconduct, it…