From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Feb 19, 2002
534 U.S. 1155 (2002)

Opinion

FEBRUARY 19, 2002


No. 01-7780. CLEMENTS v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 22 Fed. Appx. 85.

No. 01-7796. ZAPATA-REYES v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 273 F.3d 1100.

No. 01-7805. WALKER v. OHIO. Ct. App. Ohio, Hamilton County. Certiorari denied.

No. 01-7811. OLIVARES-GONZALEZ v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 273 F.3d 393.

No. 01-7828. SOLER v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 273 F.3d 398.

No. 01-7832. CRISANTE-SALAZAR v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 268 F.3d 1064.

No. 01-7833. CASTRO-BARRON v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 273 F.3d 1101.

No. 01-7838. SAUCEDO-GONZALEZ v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 273 F.3d 1103.

No. 01-7851. VASQUEZ-RESENDIZ v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 01-7854. LINTON v. WALKER, WARDEN. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 26 Fed. Appx. 381.

No. 01-7855. HOOKS v. NORTH CAROLINA. Sup.Ct. N.C. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 353 N.C. 629, 548 S.E.2d 501.

No. 01-7897. PEEPLES v. MITCHELL, WARDEN. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 01-782. YANCEY v. HARRIS. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. JUSTICE BREYER took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition. Reported below: 16 Fed. Appx. 673.

No. 01-874. BIBBY v. PHILADELPHIA COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO. C.A.3d Cir. Certiorari denied. JUSTICE BREYER took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition. Reported below: 260 F.3d 257.


Summaries of

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Feb 19, 2002
534 U.S. 1155 (2002)
Case details for

Certiorari Denied

Case Details

Full title:CERTIORARI DENIED

Court:U.S.

Date published: Feb 19, 2002

Citations

534 U.S. 1155 (2002)
122 S. Ct. 1126

Citing Cases

State v. Rodriguez

Similarly, we have also stated that the record contained sufficient evidence to support the submission of the…

Williams v. House

[citation omitted]. Therefore, harassment based solely upon a person's sexual preference or orientation (and…