From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Oct 2, 2000
531 U.S. 902 (2000)

Summary

holding that R.C. Chapter 2950 does not violate constitutional rights guaranteed by the Double Jeopardy, Bill of Attainder, and Equal Protection Clauses of the United States and Ohio Constitutions, and does not violate rights enumerated in Section 1, Article I of the Ohio Constitution

Summary of this case from State v. Wilson

Opinion

OCTOBER 2, 2000


00-5392 GRIFFIN v. MOORE, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.

00-5393 HOLMAN v. STEGALL, WARDEN. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.

00-5394 HAMPTON v. MOORE, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL. C.A 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.

00-5396 DeBRUIN v. YUKINS, WARDEN. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.

00-5397 STEVENS v. MICHIGAN. Sup.Ct. Mich. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 461 Mich. 655, 610 N.W.2d 881.

00-5398 SPERRY v. CALIFORNIA. Ct. App. Cal., 3d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.

00-5399 WHITE v. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

00-5400 BARNES v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 208 F.3d 218.

00-5401 CEBALLOS-MUNOZ v. UNITED STATES. C.A.2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 210 F.3d 356.

00-5403 REDMAN v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 216 F.3d 1085.

00-5404 LOPEZ RELLS v. CALIFORNIA. Sup.Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 22 Cal.4th 860, 996 P.2d 1184.

00-5405 SUFFECOOL v. OHIO. Sup.Ct. Ohio. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 88 Ohio St.3d 513, 728 N.E.2d 342.

00-5406 KESZENHEIMER v. USAA LIFE INSURANCE CO. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 209 F.3d 719.

00-5407 ANTONIO JAVIER ET AL. v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 199 F.3d 552.


Summaries of

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Oct 2, 2000
531 U.S. 902 (2000)

holding that R.C. Chapter 2950 does not violate constitutional rights guaranteed by the Double Jeopardy, Bill of Attainder, and Equal Protection Clauses of the United States and Ohio Constitutions, and does not violate rights enumerated in Section 1, Article I of the Ohio Constitution

Summary of this case from State v. Wilson

holding that R.C. 2950.09 was not void-for-vagueness; statute not unconstitutional under due process clause of constitution; statute does not violate guarantees against double jeopardy, or bills of attainder, or the right to equal protection of the laws under both federal and state constitutions; statute also does not violate citizens' rights under Section 1, Article I, Ohio Constitution or the rights to privacy, property, pursuit of an occupation, or a favorable reputation

Summary of this case from Dickason v. State
Case details for

Certiorari Denied

Case Details

Full title:CERTIORARI DENIED

Court:U.S.

Date published: Oct 2, 2000

Citations

531 U.S. 902 (2000)

Citing Cases

Williams v. Phillips

");Duran v. United States, 94 CR. 300, 00 Civ. 407, 2002 WL 867864 at *3 (S.D.N.Y. May 3, 2002) ("This Court…

U.S. v. Baltazar-Murrieta

The exclusionary ruling was not an abuse of discretion. United States v. Benavidez-Benavidez, 217 F.3d 720,…