From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Apr 16, 2001
532 U.S. 976 (2001)

Opinion

APRIL 16, 2001


No. 00-7977. HOLLOWAY v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 234 F.3d 1270.

No. 00-7639. PHILLIPS v. CALIFORNIA. Sup.Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied.

No. 00-7831. LIGHTFOOT v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 224 F.3d 586.

No. 00-7955. MORROW v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 234 F.3d 1270.

No. 00-8058. RODRIGUEZ v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 223 F.3d 85.

No. 00-8327. McWHORTER v. ALABAMA. Sup.Ct. Ala. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 781 So.2d 330.

No. 00-8348. DIZELOS v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 217 F.3d 841.

No. 00-8409. HERBIN v. HOEFFEL ET AL. C.A.D.C. Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 00-8410. HOLLOWAY v. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 00-8414. FRYE v. MANTELLO, SUPERINTENDENT, COXSACKIE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY. C.A.2d Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 00-8416. GANDY v. TEXAS. Ct. Crim. App. Tex. Certiorari denied.

No. 00-8417. FAILS v. TEXAS. Ct. App. Tex., 5th Dist. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 999 S.W.2d 144.

No. 00-8418. HEMBRY v. ANGELONE, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 00-8419. HODSON v. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 00-8423. FARRIS v. SAFFLE, DIRECTOR, OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL. (two judgements). Ct. Crim. App. Okla. Certiorari denied.


Summaries of

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Apr 16, 2001
532 U.S. 976 (2001)
Case details for

Certiorari Denied

Case Details

Full title:CERTIORARI DENIED

Court:U.S.

Date published: Apr 16, 2001

Citations

532 U.S. 976 (2001)

Citing Cases

Johnson v. State

766 So.2d at 939–40. This comment by the prosecutor was an argument to the jury concerning the strength of…

Johnson v. State

766 So. 2d at 939-40. This comment by the prosecutor was an argument to the jury concerning the strength of…