From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Mar 26, 2001
532 U.S. 947 (2001)

Summary

holding that "[i]n light of the Supreme Court's decision in Williams, we find that Nevers and Maurino no longer correctly state the law on the issue of the appropriate standard under 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)."

Summary of this case from Wiles v. Bagley

Opinion

MARCH 26, 2001


No. 00-8162. SYVERTSON v. MALAKTARIS ET AL. Sup.Ct. N. D. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 622 N.W.2d 432.

No. 00-8167. TRAN v. ROE, WARDEN. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 00-8170. CONTRERAS v. WILLIAMS, WARDEN, ET AL. C.A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 00-8171. DUNCAN v. BOOKER, SUPERINTENDENT, MISSISSIPPI STATE PENITENTIARY, ET AL. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 00-8177. TIMMONS v. SOUTH CAROLINA. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 225 F.3d 655.

No. 00-8178. WALTON v. LECUREUX, WARDEN. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 00-8179. COLEMAN v. CHILDS, SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL MISSISSIPPI CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, ET AL. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 00-8183. GARATE v. HOOD, WARDEN. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 00-8184. HICKEY v. MOORE, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 00-8185. HARRIS v. STOVALL, WARDEN. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 212 F.3d 940.

No. 00-8187. LOGAN v. WILLIAMS, WARDEN, ET AL. C.A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 00-8188. HAYDEN v. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 00-8191. GRAY v. ZAVARAS ET AL. C.A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 232 F.3d 901.

No. 00-8193. BELLAH v. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION. Ct. App. Tex., 5th Dist. Certiorari denied.


Summaries of

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Mar 26, 2001
532 U.S. 947 (2001)

holding that "[i]n light of the Supreme Court's decision in Williams, we find that Nevers and Maurino no longer correctly state the law on the issue of the appropriate standard under 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)."

Summary of this case from Wiles v. Bagley

discussing alternate standards

Summary of this case from Maurent v. Warden, Ross Corr. Inst.

discussing alternate standards

Summary of this case from Jones v. Warden, Pickaway Corr. Inst.

construing Williams

Summary of this case from Sutton v. Bell

discussing alternate standards

Summary of this case from Robertson v. Sheets

discussing alternate standards

Summary of this case from Guidry v. Sheets

discussing alternate standards

Summary of this case from Peeks v. Sheets

construing Williams

Summary of this case from Sutton v. Bell

discussing alternate standards

Summary of this case from Brown v. Voorhies

discussing alternate standards

Summary of this case from King v. Wolfe

discussing alternate standards

Summary of this case from Brown v. Sheets

discussing alternate standards

Summary of this case from Helton v. Jeffreys

discussing alternate standards

Summary of this case from Socha v. Wilson

construing Williams

Summary of this case from Nichols v. Bell
Case details for

Certiorari Denied

Case Details

Full title:CERTIORARI DENIED

Court:U.S.

Date published: Mar 26, 2001

Citations

532 U.S. 947 (2001)

Citing Cases

Troglin v. Qualls

Ordinarily when state courts issue orders denying relief without discussing the applicable law, this Court…

Shelton v. Osborne

Ordinarily when state courts issue orders denying relief without discussing the applicable law, this Court…