From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Century Sur. Co. v. Saidian

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 16, 2016
Case No. CV 12-7428 SS (C.D. Cal. Mar. 16, 2016)

Opinion

Case No. CV 12-7428 SS

03-16-2016

CENTURY SURETY COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. MANSOUR SAIDIAN, d/b/a ATOMIC CITY, d/b/a PARIS FUNK, Defendant.


JUDGMENT

On July 28, 2015, this matter came on regularly for trial. This action was tried by a jury with United States Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal presiding. A duly sworn and instructed jury rendered a Special Verdict on August 3, 2015 in favor of Defendant and Counterclaimant Mansour Saidian and against Plaintiff and Counterdefendant Century Surety Company on Saidian's claims for breach of contract and violation of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. The jury found that Saidian had suffered a loss of $100,000.00 and incurred economic damages of $11,138.00 and non-economic damages of $38,862.00. (Dkt. No. 100).

Following the jury trial, the Court heard Plaintiff's motion for judgment on its declaratory relief claim and Defendant's motion for attorney's fees, both of which it denied in separate orders issued concurrently with this Judgment.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that judgment in the above-entitled case shall be entered in favor of Saidian and against Century Surety Company in the above amounts.

IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: March 16, 2016

/S/_________

SUZANNE H. SEGAL

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Century Sur. Co. v. Saidian

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 16, 2016
Case No. CV 12-7428 SS (C.D. Cal. Mar. 16, 2016)
Case details for

Century Sur. Co. v. Saidian

Case Details

Full title:CENTURY SURETY COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. MANSOUR SAIDIAN, d/b/a ATOMIC CITY…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 16, 2016

Citations

Case No. CV 12-7428 SS (C.D. Cal. Mar. 16, 2016)

Citing Cases

Townsend Farms, Inc. v. Göknur Gidamaddeleri Enerji Imalat Ithalat Ihracat Ticaret Ve Sanayi A.

39. Declaratory relief is an equitable claim for the Court, rather than the jury, to decide, but in doing so…

Embotelladora Electropura S.A. de C.V. v. Accutek Packaging Equip. Co.

"The 'procedural requirement of filing a Rule 50(a) motion before filing a Rule 50(b) motion' is construed…