Opinion
Argued October 24, 1934 —
Decided February 4, 1935.
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 112 N.J.L. 215.
For the respondents, Hobart Minard and John A. Bernhard.
For the appellant, Pierre P. Garven.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Lloyd in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, JJ. 7.
For reversal — THE CHIEF JUSTICE, PERSKIE, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, JJ. 4.