From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cent. Kan. Med. Ctr. v. Hatesohl

Court of Appeals of Kansas.
Mar 18, 2016
366 P.3d 1104 (Kan. Ct. App. 2016)

Opinion

113,675 113,834.

03-18-2016

CENTRAL KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER, d/b/a St. Rose Ambulatory and Surgery Center, Appellant, v. Stanley M. HATESOHL, M.D.; Great Bend Regional Hospital, L.L.C.; and Central Kansas Family Practice, P.C., Appellees.

Samuel L. Blatnick, G. Mark Sappington, and Meredith A. Webster, of Kutak Rock LLP, of Kansas City, Missouri, for appellant. Arthur S. Chalmers, Stephen H. Netherton, and Randy J. Troutt, of Hite, Fanning & Honeyman, L.L.P., of Wichita, for appellee Stanley M. Hatesohl, M.D. Michael J. Fleming and Franke J. Forbes, of Forbes Law Group, LLC, of Overland Park, for appellees Great Bend Regional Hospital LLC and Central Kansas Family Practice, PC.


Decision Without Published Opinion

Reversed and remanded with directions.


Summaries of

Cent. Kan. Med. Ctr. v. Hatesohl

Court of Appeals of Kansas.
Mar 18, 2016
366 P.3d 1104 (Kan. Ct. App. 2016)
Case details for

Cent. Kan. Med. Ctr. v. Hatesohl

Case Details

Full title:CENTRAL KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER, d/b/a St. Rose Ambulatory and Surgery…

Court:Court of Appeals of Kansas.

Date published: Mar 18, 2016

Citations

366 P.3d 1104 (Kan. Ct. App. 2016)

Citing Cases

Cent. Kan. Med. Ctr. v. Hatesohl

The panel reversed on all four grounds and remanded for further proceedings. Central Kansas Medical Center v.…